Hi Brian,
A few observations on Healey cooling systems.
Altough the cars were built mostly for USA export, West coast even, they never seemed to realize that many places are far hotter than in England. They did acknowledge this somewhat by making six, eight & more bladed fans for special export on request. The radiator cores were too small for the hot US climes.
The factory combinations of two, four & six bladed fans just added pairs as needed. These fans have been know to lose a blade with serious consequences, as have the older four blade cast aluminum ones.
A couple of illustrations - My 100-4 had five rows of widely spaced 1/2" tubes, 150 tubes total, with plate type fins spaced at 10 fins per inch. A four blade fan was used. My replacement core has four rows of 48 more narrowly spaced 5/8" tubes, 192 tubes total, with serpentine fins spaced at 14 fins per inch. This represents about 60% more tube area & 40% more fin area.
This more dense & efficient core requires more air flow pressure to force the air through. I'm using a steel 6 blade engine driven fan. At speed, the engine runs at 180 on a very hot day, & up to 190 in stop & go traffic.
The six cylinder radiator designs usually used two rows of a similarly inefficient design. Most of the people I know who drive in hot climates have converted their radiator cores to four rows of more densely spaced tubes. Remember, it takes more fan also. The later Healeys also had front side ducting between the grille & radiator. These ducts sometimes get left out somewhere along the way.
Another item that people miss is that the six cylinder Healeys have an internal radiator bypass port in the head for inrernal flow when the thermostat is closed. As the thermostat opens, there is supposed to be a sleeve on it that blocks the internal radiator bypass. Many replacement thermostats do not have this sleeve or the sleeve is improperly located.
A fan that is powerful enough to do the job requires about two hp to drive it. Very few accessory type electric fans are powerful enough to substitute for the engine driven fan. A two HP electric fan will draw over 100 amps. Fans mounted in front of the radiator are about 40% less efficient than those mounted behind the radiator.
An efficient fan shroud will do wonders for the cooling situation, if the radiator is up to it. The shroud should be designed to collect air from the entire back surface of the radiator, not just a small barrel in the center. I've seen a couple of custom made or adapted shrouds that fit the requirements. Of course, any shroud is better than none.
In stop & go driving, a 160 thermostat offers some margine over a 180. If the engine can cool to 160 between stops it takes a little longer to get too hot than if it can only drop to 180 between stops. Not much gain, but a little.
As a matter of curiousity I measured the temps on my late model Toyota V6. After an extended drive & idling period, AC turned on, I measured the engine to radiator outlet temperature at 180 degrees. The dash temp gage was reading right in the center. So much for late models running hotter, at least in this case. This car has a very efficient aluminum/plastic composite radiator & two electric fans which draw about 50 amps each. This car has a pretty hefty electrical system. I use an infrared "thermo gun" for instant temp readings.
If you are not the worrying perfectionest type of person, just ignore the temp gage & don't get excited unless the car actually boils & looses it's coolant.
D