Hey there Guest! If you enjoy BCF and find our forum a useful resource, if you appreciate not having ads pop up all over the place and you want to ensure we can stay online - Please consider supporting with an "optional" low-cost annual subscription.
Hey there Guest - be sure to keep your profile page up to date with interesting info about yourself: learn more
What the heck is that "Resources" tab up there all about? Learn more
More tips and tricks on Posting and Replying: click
Everything you've ever wanted to know about bookmarks, but were afraid to ask: Learn More
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the smilie in place of the real @
Want to mention another member in a post & get their attention? WATCH THIS
So, you created a "Group" here at BCF and would like to invite other members to join? Watch this!
Hey Guest - A post a day keeps Basil from visiting you in the small hours and putting a bat up your nightdress!
Hey Guest - do you know of an upcoming British car event? Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> Here's How <<
Hey Guest - you be stylin' Change the look and feel of the forum to fit your taste. Check it out
If you run across an inappropriate post, for example a post that breaks our rules or looks like it might be spam, you can report the post to the moderators: Learn More
I keep hearing that but check the mileage stickers on the new cars Jack. The 5 speeds always do better. You have to lose power in the torque converter and running the pump. Even with a lock up converter you are still running the pump and have the extra weight of the automatic. Plus changing a clutch is a piece of cake compared the to the financial time bomb of an automatic transmission.
I keep hearing that but check the mileage stickers on the new cars Jack. The 5 speeds always do better. You have to lose power in the torque converter and running the pump. Even with a lock up converter you are still running the pump and have the extra weight of the automatic. Plus changing a clutch is a piece of cake compared the to the financial time bomb of an automatic transmission.
I mostly agree Kim, but, My Mazda 6 actually is rated better with the 6 speed auto than the 5 speed manual - course I have the 5 speed cause it's way more fun. I also recall that later Saabs had more reliable auto boxes than manual. (Generally I think you're right though)
A lot of today's automatics are computer controlled "standards." They have clutches, instead of torque converters. Still... I'll take the manual please.
A lot of today's automatics are computer controlled "standards." They have clutches, instead of torque converters. Still... I'll take the manual please.
I have torn into a couple and they do have clutches but there is a lot more going in there besides two gears spinning to make the car move.
I got a rivergate adapter plate and a datsun 210 automatic that mates up to it. That is for if my knees get worse and I need replacements or whatever, but not until then.
The "corvette " engine is the older style and the automatic installed will defininite take power away. The new trannys are very large. Therefore the width will eat up interior room. another reason these V-8 conversions use A/Ts. No place left to have a clutch pedal confortably.
Also most people use a FORD V-8 since they are 7" narrower. Very nice car tho!
I just don't understand why the rubber bumbers ?? on a car that so much detail was done
A friendly reminder - be careful what links you click on here. If a link is posted by someone you don't know, or the URL looks fishy, DON'T CLICK. Spammers sometimes post links that lead to sites that can infect your computer, so be mindful what you click.
(Click X in the upper-right to dismiss this notice)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.