[ QUOTE ]
I could be just paranoid, but I would find it hard to beleive that Triumph designers used any different techniques on the Spit frame than they did with the '6'.
Maybe I should rephrase my question - Where are the weak spots in the frame and what can I do to improve these areas?
[/ QUOTE ]Actually, the designs ARE quite different. Unlike the various frames of the TRs, the Spitfire's frame is primarily a "backbone" down the center, with some outriggers to hold up the "semi-monocoque" body tub. That's why, among other parts, the inner / intermediate / outer sill panel integrity is so important on a Spitfire, and why they begin to sag somewhat easily once serious rust hits that sill area. But the sag is nothing like that on a TR tub. I've had rusted TR tubs that virtually folded in half when removed from a chassis, while a Spitfire tub with badly rusted sills and little metal in the floor panels will still maintain its overall shape when removed from the chassis.
The earlier Spitfire chassis seems to be a fairly robust item in and of itself, and it wasn't nearly so susceptible to rust as was the later TR chassis (or some later Spitfire chassis, where the added "Federal" rear outriggers ended up being water/mud traps). /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif