It's nothing new, Girling and assigns have been saying that for some time; so has Apple Hydraulics. I see several explanations, take your pick :
1) They (well, someone) originally put a lot of time and money into researching performance with glycol. They have no motivation to repeat the process with silicone.
2) Any excuse to reduce their legal liability and/or return rate.
3) Using silicone means you won't be buying any parts from them in the future. They would much rather you ran glycol, and had to repair your brakes every few years.
At any rate, I feel that the benefits of using silicone far outweigh the benefits of their "warranty" (which cost more, that MC or your paint job ?) so for me the decision is a no-brainer. You have to make your own decision.
But I might be tempted to return any unit so marked, saying it was not suitable for the advertised application
(I also don't deal with AH, for that very reason.)