Hi Steve,
Thanks, I stand corrected. However, the fact is the Facet pump is sensitive to contaminants in fuel and requires an input filter for protection.
What's so interesting, in context of our “Bulletproofing” topic, is that the Healey's technology is not significantly sensitive to fuel contaminants and could easily and reliably handle the dirty fuel of the day. The protection originally placed within our fuel systems consisted of screens on the input side of the SU pump and carburetors to block the passage of quite large pieces of foreign matter. Today, our pump fuels are much cleaner, however, the inclusion of modern technologies (i.e. Facet pump, etc.) into the fuel system now requires we also add a filter to remove relatively fine contaminants from our fuel flow or risk the failure of this unit (i.e. Facet backup pump). So, are we improving the operational reliability of the fuel system or ... increasing risk and adding to the failure potential.
Would it be better to incorporate a backup "SU Fuel Pump" having the same insensitivity to fuel contaminants or, as many have done, add higher levels of filtration to our fuel system for increased security of clean fuel delivery to our carburetors. I often wonder if, by modernizing certain systems in our Healey we may not be improving it but opening it to unanticipated issues.
Don't misunderstand, I do believe there are some technologies that are beneficial and desirable to add and will improve reliability and serviceability. (i.e alternator, electronic ignition, etc.). However, their addition carries its own risk but eliminates more and the substitution results in a net reduction of failure probability.
Just some thoughts,
Ray(64BJ8P1)