Hi,
I've not seen a really torn up ring gear like that either. Now that's some serious wear!
One possible reason for it is that the TR ring gear teeth are bevelled on one side, but not on the other.
The bevel can be installed toward the front of the car, or toward the rear, simply by removing and flipping over the ring gear.
The design of the starter being used with the particular ring gear determines the correct orientation of the bevels. Early TR2/3 have the "short" or "bullnose" starter, with a pinion that pushes out toward the back, engaging the leading edge of the ring gear. In this case, the leading edge of the ring gear, where the starter gear engages, should have the bevel.
With later TR3 and TR4/4A, the "long" starter positions the gear behind the ring gear and pulls it forward to engage the ring gear from behind. In this case, the bevel should be on the trailing edge of the ring gear.
I'm not sure about the 6 cylinder engine. Anyone know?
To complicate matters, many of us now have modern gear reduction starters on our TRs. These all appear to operate like the short starter (TR2/3) engaging the leading edge of the ring gear. So, anyone installing one of these in later TR3/4/4A and not flip-flopping the ring gear is now engaging the un-bevelled side. With gear reduction starters, I've been *told* it's not necessary to match them up with the bevel on the ring gear. I still wonder, though, if it wouldn't be better. Seems to me I've heard about way too many of the new starters failing pretty quickly, I'm just not sure if the ring gear bevel is a factor or not.
Yes, some TRs have pressed/shrunk-on ring gears that need moderate heating to install (not enough to remove temper, though). In particular, earliest TR2/3 used this type, and sometime later in TR250/5/6 (not sure the exact change point, apparently done as an economy move). In between, a bolt-on ring gear was used. But, both types of ring gears have the bevelled teeth on one side, plain on the other. BTW, has anyone ever heard of a the press-on ring gear slipping on the flywheel?
The upshot of all this is that maybe that's what happened here: A starter swap resulted in a mis-match between the starter gear and the bevel on the ring gear, causing problems and the heavy wear seen. I can't be certain from the photo if the bevel or non-bevel edge is the one that's chewed up so badly.
Alternatively, a starter that fails to engage fully, or stays engaged slightly, will tear up itself and, eventually, a ring gear. Depending upon whether it's a short/push starter or long/pull, shimming was used to increase or decrease engagement. But the shimming of the starter is a bit of a mystery, too. My TR4 had a single shim under the original starter. This would slightly increase engagement of the long type starter into the rear-bevelled ring gear, as original to the car. However, the shim would reduce engagement of the modern gear reduction starter now on the car.
Aside from shimming, problems in the starter could be preventing the pinion from moving it's full stroke, one way or the other or both. That might leave it partly engaged when the car is running or fail to fully engage it during starting or both.
Also, any "wobble" in the flywheel, might cause ring gear/starter problems. It's most likely that this would pretty quickly progress to a catastrophic flywheel failure, but certainly is something to check carefully: Tight and secure mounting at the crankshaft, no runout and good balance.
One common thing you touched upon is that the ring gear teeth tend to wear in one segment (just not to the extent seen in the photo!), because the engine nearly always stops in that one orientation. While it's apart, it's good practice to remove the ring gear from the flywheel and rotate it 90 or 270 degrees, to put some fresher teeth at the starter.
I would guess that a ring gear badly worn all the way around would indicate either a dragging pinion, for one of the above reasons, possibly over-engagement being a key one. A ring gear worn heavily in one area seems to me more like it would be due to under-engagement, slipping on the first few teeth when the starter gear is trying to engage.
Keep us posted!
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cheers.gif