Randy Forbes said:
...
I still have never gotten an explanation (even from vintage racers running Bugattis) of the logic of running postive camber; anyone here know?
My father--who was an auto shop teacher and factory rep for Ford--explains it thusly:
If you place an ice cream cone on its side and roll it, it will turn towards the small end of the cone. Camber--if you imagine the tilt of the wheel forming a cone with an extended axle line as its center--causes the tires to want to turn as well, to the outside in the case of positive camber. That causes the two front tires to try to turn away from the car as you drive, restrained, of course, by the steering rods. This takes up slop in--and generally tightens--the steering which is compensated for by a bit of toe-in. I suspect--but don't know for sure--that modern rack-and-pinion steering requires less as it inherently has less slop than gear-type steering mechanisms.
Also, camber goes increasingly negative with body roll, which increases the tire patch and grip and helps turn the car. Negative initial camber gives better 'turn in;' good for racing but making steering a bit too squirrely for most everyday drivers. A little positive camber probably gives a little understeer, which is considered a good thing for average (i.e. bad) drivers.