RickB said:
Doc said:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:]When was the last time you saw a Chevy Cobalt driver do a walk-around and preflight
When was the last time you did a walk around "preflight" on your LBC?
I do it pretty much every time. I'm in the habit so I also do it on the family (3 ton curb weight) van.
You just can't know the state of everything unless you look often. Once you get in the habit the slightest thing will catch your attention.
Like: "gee that left rear tire looks a little low".
With our little cars so much depends on every little nut and bolt. Being aware of the rattles and shakes that are normal you will know when something new starts to come loose.
You have to have a regular maintenance schedule where you not only change fluids and pump in new grease but also check the tightness of those nuts and bolts. Having an A arm come loose at freeway speed isn't something anyone wants to experience.
Still - I totally prefer the car with no chips to the one that depends on them.
Maybe it's because I'm in IT and I have a healthy respect for the failure rate of electronics. Maybe it's just that the simple nature of our cars has it's own intrinsic value.
Anyone know the total number of parts down to nuts, bolts and washers in an LBC versus the total number in an average new car?
I'll bet that statistic would be educational.[/QUOTE]
I would not be surprised to find that a comparable new car had fewer nuts, bolts and individual parts than say, an XJ6. After all one electronic box will replace an entire mechanical climate control, etc. Also much of the carmakers energy goes into making cars easy to build: more un-repairable subassemblies, but fewer individual parts. I do know that there is a lot more wiring and it will only get worse until multiplexing becomes widespread.