jsfbond said:Old time driving knowledge/skills may not be enough to overcome the new technology.
Westfield_XI said:jsfbond said:Old time driving knowledge/skills may not be enough to overcome the new technology.
Maybe new skills are needed to work with and not against the new tech?
Westfield_XI said:jsfbond said:Old time driving knowledge/skills may not be enough to overcome the new technology.
Maybe new skills are needed to work with and not against the new tech?
DrEntropy said:Westfield_XI said:jsfbond said:Old time driving knowledge/skills may not be enough to overcome the new technology.
Maybe new skills are needed to work with and not against the new tech?
Are we to abrogate responsibility to a machine then?
It skirts forum rules, but: there's no reasonably known entity to take responsibility from an individual and allow it to be delegated to "technology" unless we ascribe to a collective paradigm. I'm unwilling to do that.
"I am the Captain of my ship" an' all that.
Hap Waldrop said:What I'm sick of these days are the cell phone talkers and even more the texters, I rather drive with drunk drivers than these idiots, at least the drunks are trying to look at the road.
Westfield said:I assume that along with not driving an automatic transmission, you don't ever travel by commercial airliner. Because most of the time the human is only in the loop to observe. We abrogated responsibility to machines a long time ago..... From the telecoms system and internet to power generation and sewage treatment it's all automated nowadays.
Hap said:It would be great in the world if every license driver had to do some sort of driving survival test, we do these in the SCCA with Tire Rack sponsorship for teenagers. We teach them panic situations, and car control, drills like wet and dry skid pad, panic braking and many more things.
14dna said:I agree with Doc;
Even though the machine is doing the work, the guy at the stick knows what to do if it fails.
![]()
jsfbond said:steering the (1963 Lincoln Continental) family car.