According to the chassis number, this drops it into a BN1 production date of about 2nd week of September 1953, in other words pulled from the line extremely early, they were still just gearing up for production. The numbers and bits for the BN3 cars date almost a full year later, at least the ones on BN3/4. I wonder why they list the original 4 cylinder engine number?
I am very skeptical about this car. The doors look to be the longer 6 cylinder ones, therefore the wheelbase would be of a 6. The radiator would be a later thing and the bonnet is that of a later 6 with the prop rod over on the right side. A lot of this car looks very home built.
As for being one of the missing BN3's, I was involved in the discovery and rescue of the very ugly BN3/4 which is pictured in Emerson's book. If genuine, there should be a brass Warwick BN3/X on the bulkhead. Think about it, the Healeys were in charge of development, not Austin's, and they would at least have worked together on it or DMH would never allow his name to be on it.
Rich Chrysler
Hundred Registrar