
Offline
Bob_Spidell said:Kinda changes the perspective a little (in my mind anyway). Instead of buyers specifically 'targeting' a 100M for the added performance (or panache) it's probable--since a relatively large number of BN2 100Ms were shipped--that some bought 100Ms because they wanted a Healey 100 and there happened to be an 'M' on the lot (and, of course, the 'louvred bonnet' is way cool).
Absolutely. There was hardly a waiting list for the 100M. In fact, here is an extract of the history of my 100M that I wrote with the help of the original owner, from whom I bought it, and it demonstrates that they were not necessarily all that sought after back in the day:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:]My 100M was purchased new by Phillip H. Hancock on November 2, 1956. He purchased the car from Speedcraft Enterprises in Exton, Pennsylvania. The owner of Speedcraft Enterprises, Otto Linton, had accepted the car with a shipment of the then-new Austin-Healey 100-Six models which he received from Max Hoffman, the New York distributor for Austin. Production of the Austin-Healey 100 (and 100M) had ended in July 1956, and production of the new 100-Six model had begun in August. Thus, this 100M was a "left-over" which was included in a shipment of the newer 100-Six cars. This may demonstrate that during this period, the 100M was not especially highly sought after. In this case, a distributor still had a new one remaining in November, well after production had ceased (in July), and several months after this particular car was built (in February).[/QUOTE]
(PM me with your email address if you'd like to read the entire history of this car and I'll send it to you.)