Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> Here's How << 
Also not a mechanic here.I've never done this and probably wont but how much of a loss in power is there to run on regular gas instead of 92 octane? It's costing about $100 CAD to fill the tank up here in Winnipeg! What negative effects besides power loss?
Karl - take a look:
![]()
You’re thinking about Octane the wrong way: 5 myths about performance culture’s most misunderstood rating.
Octane is one of the most commonly discussed, highly marketed properties of performance fuels. Fuel manufacturers tout their high-octane products. Octane boosters promise added horsepower. And Hollywood promotes “high-octane” thrills for the next installment of their latest street racing...us.etsracingfuels.com
ETS is saying higher octane produces no extra power, except in engine specifically designed for higher octane. (And UK definitions of "octane" levels is calculated very differently from US definitions.)
I run 2 TR4s and 1 TR3A. They all use regular (87). And they all have hardened valve seats. The TR4s each have 20000 to 40000 miles each.Have you tried regular in the tank? Noticed any difference?
I got to thinking more about my answer. And it is incorrect. The hardened valve seats were needed when we switched from regular to unleaded gas.P
Also not a mechanic here.
The higher octane fuel better protects your valves.
If you have added hardened valve seats to the head then the use of regular (87) gas is okay.
Charley
I’m constantly amazed at how much of what we would consider automotive common sense has been lost over the last few decadesTR - it is SO good to see the "octane" discussions again. Most young guys I know have no clue (1) how an engine works, and (2) what regular, midgrade, premium, supertest, etc. even mean these day. One of my favorites is "I always fill the tank with 1/2 regular and 1/2 premium, just to give my classic a treat.
oy.
All cars need oil, right?
View attachment 108257
Anyway, thanks for bringing this up.
TomM
Tom,Thanks for jumping back into the discussion Charley. I’ve been reading your posts on the various TR forums for several years now. I always considered you to be one of the smartest guys in the room, so was a little concerned when one of my posts appeared to contradict yours…thanks for clearing up the confusion. I’ve learned a lot from reading your many posts. I figure anyone that can keep these old cars happy through a Redding summer must know a thing or two (I’ve had the pleasure of talking to you and seeing your beautiful cars a few times at the Dixon show).