• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

TR2/3/3A running the car on reguilar gas instead of premium?

karls59tr

Obi Wan
Bronze
Country flag
Offline
I've never done this and probably wont but how much of a loss in power is there to run on regular gas instead of 92 octane? It's costing about $100 CAD to fill the tank up here in Winnipeg! What negative effects besides power loss?
 
Certainly no expert! But the higher octane fuel prevents knock/ping depending on cylinder compression. I don't think 92/87 makes a serious dent in power, as long as knock and detonation don't occur.

Just my two cents!

Tom M.
 
P
I've never done this and probably wont but how much of a loss in power is there to run on regular gas instead of 92 octane? It's costing about $100 CAD to fill the tank up here in Winnipeg! What negative effects besides power loss?
Also not a mechanic here.
The higher octane fuel better protects your valves.
If you have added hardened valve seats to the head then the use of regular (87) gas is okay.
Charley
 
Karl - take a look:


ETS is saying higher octane produces no extra power, except in engine specifically designed for higher octane. (And UK definitions of "octane" levels is calculated very differently from US definitions.)
 
Karl - take a look:


ETS is saying higher octane produces no extra power, except in engine specifically designed for higher octane. (And UK definitions of "octane" levels is calculated very differently from US definitions.)
 
I always used 87 (regular) in my TR3a and had no problems. Didn't even need to adjust timing from spec.
 
If you are not experiencing pinging with regular, then you don’t need premium.

Running premium allows you to advance your timing, which will then increase performance.

Interestingly, going to a higher altitude has the same effect on pinging as going to a higher octane value.

If you are not experiencing pinging, then higher octane by itself (without an advance in timing) will not change performance.

Increasing your compression ratio will increase your performance, but will increase your need for higher octane to prevent pinging.

Bottom line:
Octane cures pinging.
Pinging kills engines.
 
As far as valve protection goes, an increase in octane values has no effect one way or another on valve wear (other than the damage to all components caused by pinging). Lead was introduced many years ago to gasoline to prevent pinging damage to the then “modern” high compression engines. One claimed benefit of this added lead was increased protection of valves. The science of this is way above my pay grade, and still generates lots of discussions and confusion.

During the unleaded transition period, most refiners found other ways to boost octane without the use of lead (and now all have). Some though, like Union Oil, offered unleaded in low octane regular for new cars, and premium leaded for older ones. This confused the issue of what older cars truly needed, lead or high octane, which is really an apples and oranges discussion for most cars.

To further confuse the issue, the formula to compute octane values was changed at the same time, leading everyone to conclude that removing lead had resulted in only lower octane gas being available.

Confusing, heck yeah…which is why those of us with an old car addiction are still debating all this 50 years later!
 
TR - it is SO good to see the "octane" discussions again. Most young guys I know have no clue (1) how an engine works, and (2) what regular, midgrade, premium, supertest, etc. even mean these day. One of my favorites is "I always fill the tank with 1/2 regular and 1/2 premium, just to give my classic a treat.

oy.

All cars need oil, right?

add oil.gif


Anyway, thanks for bringing this up.

TomM
 
P
Also not a mechanic here.
The higher octane fuel better protects your valves.
If you have added hardened valve seats to the head then the use of regular (87) gas is okay.
Charley
I got to thinking more about my answer. And it is incorrect. The hardened valve seats were needed when we switched from regular to unleaded gas.
Charley
 
Thanks for jumping back into the discussion Charley. I’ve been reading your posts on the various TR forums for several years now. I always considered you to be one of the smartest guys in the room, so was a little concerned when one of my posts appeared to contradict yours…thanks for clearing up the confusion. I’ve learned a lot from reading your many posts. I figure anyone that can keep these old cars happy through a Redding summer must know a thing or two (I’ve had the pleasure of talking to you and seeing your beautiful cars a few times at the Dixon show).
 
TR - it is SO good to see the "octane" discussions again. Most young guys I know have no clue (1) how an engine works, and (2) what regular, midgrade, premium, supertest, etc. even mean these day. One of my favorites is "I always fill the tank with 1/2 regular and 1/2 premium, just to give my classic a treat.

oy.

All cars need oil, right?

View attachment 108257

Anyway, thanks for bringing this up.

TomM
I’m constantly amazed at how much of what we would consider automotive common sense has been lost over the last few decades
 
Thanks for jumping back into the discussion Charley. I’ve been reading your posts on the various TR forums for several years now. I always considered you to be one of the smartest guys in the room, so was a little concerned when one of my posts appeared to contradict yours…thanks for clearing up the confusion. I’ve learned a lot from reading your many posts. I figure anyone that can keep these old cars happy through a Redding summer must know a thing or two (I’ve had the pleasure of talking to you and seeing your beautiful cars a few times at the Dixon show).
Tom,
I thank you for your post, which required me to think about this again.
I also thank you for the undeserved compliment. I am not the smartest guy. It is more like I have experienced more bone headed errors over the years and have learned from them.
Charley
 
Back
Top