[ QUOTE ]
Hi Michael,
Kenny’s got it right. If you upload the picture here (this website), you have to do the 2 steps. When the attachment is uploaded, a unique 6 digit number with a dash is inserted in front of the photo name (That keeps a new file named “engine” from overwriting an old file of the same name). Once uploaded, you need to open the attachment and copy the full URL found in the address box. Then, edit your post, click the “image” button (under “Instant UBB Code”) and paste. That will fill in the [image] / [/image] for you.
[/ QUOTE ]
I must be dense or something. The URL is: [image]https://www.britishcarforum.com/ubbthreads/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=2202[/image]
but I don't think that what I have done is going to open the picuture and put it in the body of this message. In any case you can view it in "Recent Photos"--see that my engine now looks like one of those cutaway drawings. The crank is sheared and the #1 Carillo rod is bent--notice also the unsupported journals as the crank is a five-main in a three-main engine.
There are two schools of thought on this--one that it is a stronger setup and; two, that it is weaker. I am siding with the latter folks.....
See also the intermediate bearing parts found in the sump in the attached photo.