Re: Your car could be a snitch....Event Data Recor
I agree with you, Bret [edit] to an extent- the evidence the car provides should be available, but under the same protections that are available for gathering other evidence. The simple happening of an accident is not enough to justify a warrantless search, but if there is indication of a crime, a warrant is quite easy to obtain. However, 99.99999% of car accidents are dealt with in the civil law context. A subpoena for the information is also easily obtained...I can send out one right now on any of my cases.[/edit]
I don't do car accident cases anymore, but I have done car, semi and train accident cases in the past. I am not concerned about the data recorder potentially having errors. The error rate will be far less than what is usually used to reconstruct accidents: eyewitness accounts, skid marks, the place the cars came to rest, etc. I'll take the help of a data recorder any time.
In one train accident case I had, the event data recorder verified my client's version of events (the engineer) and showed he was traveling the proper speed, had the proper lights on and blew the horm properly before a crossing. If not for that recorder, it would have been up to who does the jury believe. I'll take objective information.
Of course, the data will be only one piece of the puzzle and any error rate or demonstrated error will have to be considered when the information obtained is evaluated. I'm telling you, this is no big deal.
Ans as for the Bill- HR 5609, it has been referred to the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection. That was back in June of 2006. I doubt its going anywhere anytime soon.
https://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.05609: