T
TRDejaVu
Guest
Guest
Offline
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> Here's How << 
tony barnhill said:You know what? Bikers who hog the road & put both themselves & auto drivers in danger deserve what they get!!
IMO, bicycles should be licensed & have to pay insurance just like motorcycles!

tony barnhill said:You know what? Bikers who hog the road & put both themselves & auto drivers in danger deserve what they get!!
IMO, bicycles should be licensed & have to pay insurance just like motorcycles!
All he has to do is try that trick one time with me....he won't do it again......& if they end up on their butts, their problem.aerog said:tony barnhill said:You know what? Bikers who hog the road & put both themselves & auto drivers in danger deserve what they get!!
IMO, bicycles should be licensed & have to pay insurance just like motorcycles!
Boy - you're hitting home with me Tony. The road I take to work is a scenic "highway" (byway, whatever - it's a little road). The bikers are on there constantly, to the point that they've been trying to close the road to <span style="font-style: italic">just bikes</span>.
Anyway - the bikers constantly ride 3-4 wide. A lot of times they'll look back at cars and laugh (even though they're breaking the law).
I realize not everyone pulls over all the way when they pass, but the biker's latest tactic is really dumb. When they're in a single-file pack of 3-4 riders, the last one will look back for traffic. When a car gets within 2-3 car lengths away that last guy will suddenly pull over to the left and ride down the yellow line. I guess they're trying to cause traffic to move <span style="font-style: italic">all the way to the left</span>, but man it is <span style="font-style: italic">stupid</span>.
DNK said:Alan- your not a fan of the young bucks on thee Asian racers in shorts,T-shirt and tennis shoes?
aerog said:Anyway - the bikers constantly ride 3-4 wide. A lot of times they'll look back at cars and laugh (even though they're breaking the law).
I realize not everyone pulls over all the way when they pass, but the biker's latest tactic is really dumb. When they're in a single-file pack of 3-4 riders, the last one will look back for traffic. When a car gets within 2-3 car lengths away that last guy will suddenly pull over to the left and ride down the yellow line. I guess they're trying to cause traffic to move <span style="font-style: italic">all the way to the left</span>, but man it is <span style="font-style: italic">stupid</span>.
There are two problems I see with this story. Without seeing the accident, fault cannot be laid on the biker. Easily could have been a car driver not paying attention and ran him off the road. I've had similar close calls a couple times. Second, if the biker was wrapped around a tree, he could have been speared through the chest and a helmet wouldn't have done any good. He'd still be dead, and there would still be a traffic jam. I wear a helmet and leathers.alana said:I wonder how the one that wrapped himself round a tree on the Merritt on Sunday afternoon feels about "personal choice" now. Didn't see the accident, but let's put it this way - the ambulances were just sitting there...
CT is a no helmet state, and this muppet caused a 3 mile tailback that I sat in for a half hour. I was in the 6, and it was hot, so I wasn't feeling too charitable by the time I finally saw what the problem was...
Helmet and leathers should be compulsory, just like seatbelts in a car.
