Alan_Myers
Luke Skywalker
Offline
Hi again,
First of all, I looked up the kit I purchased at www.summitracing.com ... it's their part # SUM-890015 and includes the circuit breaker.
For additional info about the pluses and minuses of using a circuit breaker instead of a fuse, or using a self-resetting circuit breaker instead of a manually reset one, go to https://www.bcae1.com/cirbrakr.htm
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As to the sensor's temp rating, I think TRs need to be pretty cool, around 180F on/170F off. I'm going to be running that with a 160F thermostat, so the T'stat should always be fully open before the fan kicks in.
[/ QUOTE ]Alan--Unless WOT racing, I think you will find the 160 stat is way too cool--both engine performance fuel economy will decline. Not an advisable change IMHO.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, I agree that keeping an engine *too cool* after warm up can hurt engine performance and fuel economy.
But, sorry,I have to respectfully disagree that a 165F thermostat is overly cool (note: a slight correction from my earlier response... it's a 165F, not 160F).
For one, my car is a 4-cylinder TR, and there ain't no such thing as "too cool" with one of those! Most cooling system problems have to do with "too hot". I've been using a 165F in my TR4 for over 25 years now. But I know it doesn't effect running temps, either way, after initial warm up.
I notice that, according to the shop manual for the 6 cylinder TR, 180F "normal" and 190F "cold climate" thermostats were originally what was offered. But, I see TRF and others now offer 165F, too.
Basically, any thermostat serves only to delay coolant circulation until an engine reaches a minimum temperature. Once that minimum operating temp is reached, the thermostat is no longer in play for all practical purposes.
In other words, so long as a thermostat doesn't have *too high* a temp rating that would cause it to delay cooling for too long, it will have almost nothing to do with actual operating temps once it's fully opened.
The cooling fan and it's actuating thermoswitch will have primary effect and control of warmed-up, running temperatures. 170F is the shut off point for the fan, measured at the lower hose where coolant is returning to the engine. Temperatures at the upper hose, i.e. coolant exiting the engine, will undoubtedly be higher.
The primary purpose of choosing a 195F "winter" or 180F "normal" or 165F "summer" is to better accomodate the car's heater for the comfort of driver and passenger. With a 195F thermostat, the heater will provide toasty air faster than with a 165F.
My car doesn't happen to have a heater installed, so I simply want the cooliing system circulating fully at the lowest *reasonable* temperature.
Besides, I'm running Weber DCOE on the TR and my "Triumph Support Vehicle" is a Land Rover... so fuel economy musn't be very high on my priority list, although maybe it should be at today's prices! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
First of all, I looked up the kit I purchased at www.summitracing.com ... it's their part # SUM-890015 and includes the circuit breaker.
For additional info about the pluses and minuses of using a circuit breaker instead of a fuse, or using a self-resetting circuit breaker instead of a manually reset one, go to https://www.bcae1.com/cirbrakr.htm
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As to the sensor's temp rating, I think TRs need to be pretty cool, around 180F on/170F off. I'm going to be running that with a 160F thermostat, so the T'stat should always be fully open before the fan kicks in.
[/ QUOTE ]Alan--Unless WOT racing, I think you will find the 160 stat is way too cool--both engine performance fuel economy will decline. Not an advisable change IMHO.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, I agree that keeping an engine *too cool* after warm up can hurt engine performance and fuel economy.
But, sorry,I have to respectfully disagree that a 165F thermostat is overly cool (note: a slight correction from my earlier response... it's a 165F, not 160F).
For one, my car is a 4-cylinder TR, and there ain't no such thing as "too cool" with one of those! Most cooling system problems have to do with "too hot". I've been using a 165F in my TR4 for over 25 years now. But I know it doesn't effect running temps, either way, after initial warm up.
I notice that, according to the shop manual for the 6 cylinder TR, 180F "normal" and 190F "cold climate" thermostats were originally what was offered. But, I see TRF and others now offer 165F, too.
Basically, any thermostat serves only to delay coolant circulation until an engine reaches a minimum temperature. Once that minimum operating temp is reached, the thermostat is no longer in play for all practical purposes.
In other words, so long as a thermostat doesn't have *too high* a temp rating that would cause it to delay cooling for too long, it will have almost nothing to do with actual operating temps once it's fully opened.
The cooling fan and it's actuating thermoswitch will have primary effect and control of warmed-up, running temperatures. 170F is the shut off point for the fan, measured at the lower hose where coolant is returning to the engine. Temperatures at the upper hose, i.e. coolant exiting the engine, will undoubtedly be higher.
The primary purpose of choosing a 195F "winter" or 180F "normal" or 165F "summer" is to better accomodate the car's heater for the comfort of driver and passenger. With a 195F thermostat, the heater will provide toasty air faster than with a 165F.
My car doesn't happen to have a heater installed, so I simply want the cooliing system circulating fully at the lowest *reasonable* temperature.
Besides, I'm running Weber DCOE on the TR and my "Triumph Support Vehicle" is a Land Rover... so fuel economy musn't be very high on my priority list, although maybe it should be at today's prices! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 