DeltaAir423
Jedi Trainee
Offline
TR3driver said:Strange no one seems to have mentioned that wonderful engine design; where just not changing the coolant regularly could easily result in a repair bill higher than the value of the car ... not to mention horrible build quality (and attendant problems) in the early years. BL literally had to close the plant, because they refused to build decent cars.
A friend of mine literally sold his TR7 just because of the horror stories about reliability and repair costs circulating at the time.
TR7 is Time Magazine's 26th out of 50 worst cars of all time
Dunno about non-US performance, but the US-spec models were definitely slower than a TR6 or even a TR3. And were a total joke compared to their competition from Ford & Nissan.
But a TR8, now, or even a TR7 ragtop with a 3.5 conversion ... that I'd love to have. Gonna have to sell a Stag or two first, though.
Just looking at the list, the writer is obviously biased. On that list there are some cars that do belong, and some that obviously dont.
Some of the don'ts:
Triumph Stag
Triumph TR7
MGA Twincam
DeLorean DMC-12
Plymouth Prowler
Ford Edsel (sure the thing was UGLY! But it really had noting else wrong with it.)
Some of the ones that do belong:
Corvair (Good idea, bad execution)
Ford Pinto (Prototype was very good, production very poor)
Morgan Plus 8 Propane (What was Bill Fink thinking???)
Chevy EV1 (See Corvair)
I just sense a little bit, ok a lot, of bias in the writer's article. Especially when you reach the Hummer H2 piece where the politics really jump in.
Of course that's just my opinion, I could be sleeping in my Spit!
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
