• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

TR2/3/3A TR2/3 bumper vs TR3A bumper [front]

Share this page

A

Adrio

Jedi Knight
Country flag
Offline
I seem to be asking more questions then I am answering these days, but I promise to make it up to you in the morning.

In my hunt to figure out why my starter handle hits my bumper I am wondering if I have the wrong front bumper bar. Is there a way to tell which one I have? I bought it in 1988 but back then I did not know that my registration had the wrong year for my car (the registrations said 1957 but the Comm. Number would indicate it is a 1959) so that may have lead to the wrong bumper bar.

If anyone knows the differences and if they are easy to describe or if there is some quick way to tell which one I have I would be most in your debt.

Adrio
 
If you had the wrong one, you wouldn't be able to get it on the car at all. The difference is in the position of the mounting holes in the bumper.

I can't describe all the detail -- it's been a long time since I looked that closely at a small mouth -- but the bumper and it's mountings change at the same time that the small mouth 3 becomes the wide mouth 3A.
 
Thanks Moseso. That means my bumper has too much curve perhaps. At the centre the bumper is 1.5 inches away from the apron and at the mounting points it is .75 inches away from the apron. I am running out of possible answers as to why my starter handle hits the bumper.
 
Essentially, the early (pre-TR3A) bumpers were more or less flat-faced and mounted on brackets that came up from under the front apron. The TR3A bumper, in profile, is more rounded (sort of pot-bellied shape in profile if you will), and it mounts to brackets whose bolts go THROUGH the wide-mouth apron to support brackets behind.
 
No doubt I hve the TR3A bumper then. I is pot bellied and the over rider has a sharp andgle in the cut out.

This leave me with trying to figure out if it has too much curve or if somehow my apron is too far forward. Though the fact that the fat part of the starter handle is right inside the support, that is mounted to the apron makesme think the apron is in the right place.

How things (projects) expand. This all started with me wanting to replace front suspension bushngs and rebuild the carbs, now the appron is off the rad is out and I am looking at painting the engine bay and engine plus, plus plus.... :smile:
 
I can't remember how much you said the interference between bumper and crank was -- but there ARE slots in the bumper supports where they bolt to the frame, allowing some fore/aft adjustment. They are not real long, but maybe enough? Have you looked there?
 
There have been reproduction bumpers on the market that really weren't very good copies; perhaps you have one of those?

The line of the bumper should follow the car pretty close; with only about 3/8" - 1/2" gap. I'd say that 1.5" is your problem; and that you have both a bumper that is out of shape, and adjusted too far forward.
 
I think Randal has it right. Given that I have a 3/4inch difference in te spce between the car and the bumber over the length of the bumper. I think my brackets were all the way back.

To answer Moseso's question, my overlap is in the area of 3/4 inch tomaybe even an inch.

If you go to my web site you can see from the car pictures how much curve thee is on the bumper. It was bought from RTF in 1988 but a body shop installed it and I have no way of nowing if they "tweeked" it or not.
 
I'll bet that also explains the missing prop rods, between the overriders and the inner wings (through the openings in the grille). The rods have only a little room for adjustment.
 
Hmm, 1988 would have been just about when I bought my front bumper. It had been returned (to a major vendor, not TRF) for being such a poor copy, so I got it cheap.
 
TR3driver said:
I'll bet that also explains the missing prop rods, between the overriders and the inner wings (through the openings in the grille). The rods have only a little room for adjustment.
Click to expand...

And I am hopingto get the prop rods and install them when I reassemble the car this time. It will be fun.
 
Here is how to tell if the bumper on your TR3A is original or not. Here is mine. It's the original one. The ends are rounded and curve back toward the fender.
 

Attachments

  • 17738.jpg
    17738.jpg
    53.4 KB · Views: 254
Because the repro bumpers were not made on the same presses, the end flares outwardly like wings instead of curving back. I've also seen some repro bumpers which have welding on the back-side in these curves.
 

Attachments

  • 17739.jpg
    17739.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 251
The bumperless look is IN.
 
Don Elliott said:
Because the repro bumpers were not made on the same presses, the end flares outwardly like wings instead of curving back. I've also seen some repro bumpers which have welding on the back-side in these curves.
Click to expand...

Very helpful visual reference, Don. Definitely going to file this tip away to help in future part hunts.
 
Very useful picture Don, thanks. would you happen to have the same shot but of the middle section of the bumper. I want to get an idea if mine is curved too much.
 
Adrio - I restored my 1958 TR3A from 1987 to 1990. The body was finished and painted by the end of 1989. Then I sent all the parts for chroming to the local chrome shop owned and run by a bunch of Harley guys. I cut a piece of of plywood (I still have it somewhere if you want it) of the profile of the front of my TR and gave this profile "gauge" to the chrome shop along with the bumper. They straightened the bumper (front end smash in 1963 Echo Rally had deformed it) to conform to this profile about 1/2" ahead of the bodywork and then they triple plated it. When I got it back I mounted it and across the center of the TR there is a gap of about 1/2" when you stand above the bumper and look straight down. Here is a photo from the Ottawa show where we met in 2005.
 

Attachments

  • 17742.jpg
    17742.jpg
    85.2 KB · Views: 227
Here's how it had looked after the 2:00 AM smash on the Rouge River Road north of Hawkesbury in 1963. After this, I had the valance bodywork corrected and I used a 5 pound hammer to "straighten" the bumper till it was re-straightened correctly according to my profile gauge and re-chromed in 1990. YES FOLKS, - the same valance and bumper.
 

Attachments

  • 17743.jpg
    17743.jpg
    84.4 KB · Views: 213
A bumper fabricator in Vietnam is making new bumpers for the TR3A. It's owned and run by some Brits over there. They are made of stainless steel and the guys in England have reported that they are extremely satisfied by the workmanship and the polished shine of the stainless. However I believe they are painted black on the back-side. This might be removed or sprayed silver to "look" correct.

From photos I saw of these new bumpers, I seem to re-call that the ends of the bumpers are rounded correctly as in my photos above.

They also do bumperettes.

https://classifieds.parent24.com/ViewAd.aspx?adId=666dd816-f215-430a-a16a-8fefbf331b4a
 
I have one of those Vietnamese bumpers on my car.
Fit of the front bumper: Excellent
Fit of the rear "bumpers": Had to re-work the keyhole slots in 'em to get 'em over the bolts on the car.
I think they're lighter gauge than the originals, making them even more fragile. Of course the originals didn't "protect" much either...
 
Back
Top