• Hi Guest!
    You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.
    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

SWA formerly RB Midget needs rear fender flaring

Share this page

Thanks!

Yes everything is tight in the back, just a little weird that the drivers side was inset a little more than the passengers.
I'd guess 3/8".
This is measured from the unmolested top of wheel well arch to tire clearance.
In other words sticking my hand up in there and feeling how much space there was between the well and the tire.

Yes I do feel more road feedback, but steering is kind of sensitive like I'm toed in a bit.
I need to check my alignment.

I'd have to see what the flare looks like Trevor, I think it would be good but would have to see. I wouldn't want much flare up there of course.
 
Something that has always bothered me about the Midgets/Sprites is the mismatched fenders. The Bugeye has no flares. All the rest have flares on the back, but not the front. It is especially noticeable on the RWA cars.
 
Rick, my "Midget 50" car had a offset on the rear towards the passenger side. Apparently not uncommon. I know my spring bushings are bad and am in the process of completely redoing the rear. Rebuilt springs and panhard rod, perhaps shocks as well.


Kurt.
 
Paul A. used to tell me that no two are alike in this regard except by chance. Their tolerances weren't too close for either putting the fittings into the body or the welding the fittings onto the axle. Expect variation.
 
Pythias said:
Paul A. used to tell me that no two are alike in this regard except by chance. Their tolerances weren't too close for either putting the fittings into the body or the welding the fittings onto the axle. Expect variation.
Click to expand...

Yes, that was my feeling.
It seemed to drive ok like that so I've left it alone.

Almost all the steering wheel vibrations disappeared when I fitted the new front tires. There was still a little so I started checking all the bolts on the rack and the front suspension. One of the bolts holding the rack on the passenger side was a little loose.

While I was at it I hit all 6 grease fittings with the grease gun and gave things a good looking over.

I checked the alignment, it was toed in a bit over 1/8".
I adjusted it to zero, and I like the feel of it a lot better!
 
Pythias said:
Paul A. used to tell me that no two are alike in this regard except by chance. Their tolerances weren't too close for either putting the fittings into the body or the welding the fittings onto the axle. Expect variation.
Click to expand...

And I was worried about my opassenger side offest.

I've been thinking about cutting the axle tube down 1/4" and rewelding. I havetrouble with the tire touching over big bumps or hard turns.
 
You could take everything loose under there and center it but who knows what that will do to your ride. Maybe better, maybe not.
I wonder how many of these are closer to the passenger side like that?
How much space do you have between the tire and the upper edge of the fender on each side? Mine was about 1/2 inch different.
 
Mine is going to get centered. After crossing a series of railroad tracks I end up going sideways! My bug-eye was off as well. I had to do some major work on the spring mounts to get it right. It had apparently been manufactured that way since the mounts were rust free and had never been tampered with.

Kurt.
 
I will be very interested to hear about your progress, what it takes to get it done and if there is the desired positive outcome.
 
Swap Springs side to side and re-measure, they could have some Mfg. Bias. :yesnod:
 
With what I hear about modern manufacturing (ehem Boeing ehem) tolerances, being off by an inch or less on the body from one side to the other was probably totally acceptable.
 
RickB said:
I will be very interested to hear about your progress, what it takes to get it done and if there is the desired positive outcome.
Click to expand...


First move is a set of rebuilt springs. From there I will do a lot of measuring and fudge where it seems like it will work. Rebuild on the front is in order as well so I can trust a measurement from opposite front spindle.

Kurt.
 
Billm said:
Watch it Buddy!!
We aren't THAT bad!
BillM
Click to expand...

Not what I heard... :jester:

I suppose though that 1 or 2 percent on a 200 foot long jet isn't so bad right?

Heck that's nothing on a Spridget!!
 
Wow a set of wider than stock wheels being tight on a SWA car, never heard that before :jester: We're working our way thru a fitment issue with early SWA Midget as I speak, we have a customer who has the 13x5.5 Retro 4 on his 62 Midget, he has slight clearecne on one side, and the tire rubs on the othe side sitting still, I tested the same wheel width offset on a 62 SWA Midget on my end, I didn' have the wheel rub sitting still, but it's close, I think if the fender lips were rolled it works fine, but I found out over the years as you all have, no two of these cars are just alike, the factory just was not that exact. So my latest plan to try to correct this issue on early (which sits lower than most) SWA Midget/Sprite, is to adjust the offset of our normal 13x5.5 wheel, I know we can take the 4" basckspacing of the 13x5.5 wheels and make them 4.25", because thats what backspacing is on the 14x5.5 wheels,ans it appears I need a bit more backpsacing for some of the early SWA cars.

Rick, as I look at the pictures of your car with those wheels on it, it appears they even have less offset, the fronts looks to sitting outboard a good bit. I applaud your efforts to get it all to work.
 
2091351 said:
Swap Springs side to side and re-measure, they could have some Mfg. Bias. :yesnod:
Click to expand...

Did that and bought brand new ones and still the same.

Hap Waldrop said:
Wow a set of wider than stock wheels being tight on a SWA car, never heard that before :jester:
Click to expand...

Well, seeing you're new to this whole British car thing you'll catch on soon enough. :jester:

Hap, we can't see the rest of your post. I could see it when I quoted you but not in the post.
 
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:] I know we can take the 4" basckspacing of the 13x5.5 wheels and make them 4.25", because thats what backspacing is on the 14x5.5 wheels,ans it appears I need a bit more backpsacing for some of the early SWA cars.[/QUOTE]

Careful there. Then you get close to the rear springs. I have 3/16 inch spacers on my rear wheels to keep the 14x5.5" retros and 185/60 tires from rubbing the springs. Actually, 1/8" would probably have worked, but I had some 3/16" aluminum on hand.
 
Hap Waldrop said:
Rick, as I look at the pictures of your car with those wheels on it, it appears they even have less offset, the fronts looks to sitting outboard a good bit. I applaud your efforts to get it all to work.
Click to expand...

The Bugeye bonnet kind of accentuates that effect IMHO.

Like Trevor said before a small flare on those wheel wells would be nice if done well.
 
Back
Top