• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
  • When posting a classified ad, you MUST select a prefix from the drop-down next to the subject line. If you don't you will get an error and your ad will not be posted!
Tips
Tips

Ported vs Manifold Vacuum Advance

Share this page

SkinnedKnuckles

SkinnedKnuckles

Jedi Trainee
Offline
First off, I would like to acknowledge the wisdom of Randall & Poolboy and the "encouragement" that got me off my duff to find the ported vacuum tap on one of my carbs. I remember now it was there, but when I went to the triple set-up the vacuum retard was still in play, and besides I hadn't heard of ported vacuum anyway.

So this morning I rediscovered the tap and hooked it up. My impressions after a warm-up and idle adjustment:

• There is more power available when starting off in 1st gear which will help prevent stumbling. Makes sense because now the timing is increased on take-off rather than decreased. That's also why according to a single reference ported vacuum was adopted in the 1930's.

• Warm starts seem easier. Don't know about cold starts - only had 1.

• RPM's drop like a rock when shifting if you totally let up on the accelerator. Maybe I shift too slow when cruising. Not a biggie, just takes some getting used to.

• Idle stability - no apparent change.

• Cruising performance - no change.

• HC emissions - decreased :wink:

So there you have it. I was pleased with running vacuum advance off the manifold (retard) port for years, but am more pleased now. Thanks, guys.
 
Forums are great. Tell you what, when I removed the red fan in favor of an electric fan, my rpms between gear changes stayed up noticeably higher. I think the air resistance on that red fan tends to put a load on the engine that's especially noticeabe..when it's gone..
 
No - triple Strombergs. The Good Parts kit.
 
Yes - a bump. Ran an experiment to determine the vacuum in the Z-S carb mix chamber. That's the space between the piston and the throttle butterfly valve that the carbs try to maintain at a constant value. These are CD carbs & I've been curious what the actual constant depression was. Asked a couple of times, but got no response. It's 3" of water column vacuum. Not much. That's measured from the ported vacuum tap in off position. The vacuum could be slightly higher at the jet, maybe 4", but probably not given the way the piston holes are drilled & milled. Just some geek info.
 
As one geek to another, I've measured the vacuum at the "valve cover evacuation ports" on the right side of the carbs. It's roughly 1/10 of the manifold vacuum, but enough to relieve the build up of crankcase pressure.
 
Back
Top