Steve_S said:
I doubt anyone would see that as a political,
One more time with feeling - Doug's post was NOT offending per se. Yes, it is sad to see a childhood icon meet his end, which on its face seems an innocent enough topic. If they had simply killed him off for some innocuous, benign reason or because they felt they just wanted to go in another direction that would be one thing. But if you read the story behind it, <u>as I did</u>, you would know that the reason the Marvel Comic Book folks did what they did was to make a <u>very specific</u> and <u>VERY
political</u> statement about the country, the government, the war on terror, etc, etc. I appreciate that you "doubt anyone would see it as political" - however, I did see it as political. Not the post on its face, but as soon as I read the article describing why Marvel did what they did; that is to say for specific political reasons.
You could not have read that article and not seen the political nature of the entire topic of Capt America's demise. It would have been impossible to expect all of the thousands of forum members who might want to comment on the demise of Capt America to do so without commenting about their reasons - which would invariably become a political discussion. Whether I agree with their reasons or not is a moot point, I simply try to stay away from political or controversial topics on BCF (which is why you don't hear me talking about my views on Global Warming, for example). This has been my policy from day one and it is, I believe, a large part of why this forum functions as well as it does and why people who are probably polar opposites politically get along so well here. One of the difficult things about being βin chargeβ of anything is that sometimes one must make decisions which are not always fully understood or popular.
Regards,
Basil