Hello, I'm the guy Tony didn't want to embarass, because I started pointing this out a year ago over on the MGB Exp (which you guys so fondly refer to as "that other BBS").
And since Tony has all these cars, obviously, he is a MG Guru, and he knows everything about MGs. So of course, you guys will take what he says as the MG gospel.
I just need to get my word out there, and say that Tony, you're wrong. Sure, there were a couple of photos and brochures of cars that had the pictures on backwards. But you said it yourself, and the key word is "preproduction". The preproduction drawings were never 100% accurate, because the cars hadn't been finalized yet, and the artists just played around with the general image of the car. And in the photographs, we all know that MG was the type to just slap together a car, and if it was a preproduction car, the assembler still wasn't trained in the correct way and had a 50/50 chance of putting them on right.
I have a friend with a 62 that is nearly all original with them on right, all the early cars I've had through here have had them on right, even Paul Hanley's car, a 64 that has won the national MGB concours multiple times, has them on right. So, you go right ahead and try to tell people that they can go on either way on early cars, but there a bunch of people that will back me up and say that you're wrong.
And yes, I am very very passionate about my front turn signal lenses. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/jester.gif