-
Hi Guest!
You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.
There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
Land Yacht - Mercury Colony Park
- Thread starter Boink
- Start date
Share this page
Offline
I'm thinking ... 1986 Mercury Colony Park (with third brake light).
(1989 model)
www.mecum.com
(1986 model) > Two Classic Station Wagons For Sale <
(1989 model)
1989 Mercury Colony Park Station Wagon | W138 | Glendale 2022 | Mecum Auctions
1989 Mercury Colony Park Station Wagon presented as Lot W138 at Glendale, AZ
www.mecum.com
(1986 model) > Two Classic Station Wagons For Sale <
Totally hijacking this thread now... the subject of period-correct stickers (and other accessories) has been on my mind lately.
I don't believe that stickers "must" be of the exact same year as the car, as long as they don't predate the car or are of a totally different era. For example, a 1939 domestic car could reasonably have a rationing sticker on the windshield, since it would have been someone's car during the war years. OTOH, a 1948 certainly shouldn't, since it wasn't even built until well after the treaties were signed.
By my logic, if that wagon is indeed a 1986, the Dukakis sticker would be period-correct. If it's a 1990, then it's just silly.
But would it be silly for a 1954 LBC to have a badge from Queen Elizabeth's coronation? The badge would have been to signify that you experienced it, not to advertise that it was upcoming. "I was there 2 years ago" -- a bit like a sticker from a trip to the Grand Canyon in 2019. Reasonable?
I don't believe that stickers "must" be of the exact same year as the car, as long as they don't predate the car or are of a totally different era. For example, a 1939 domestic car could reasonably have a rationing sticker on the windshield, since it would have been someone's car during the war years. OTOH, a 1948 certainly shouldn't, since it wasn't even built until well after the treaties were signed.
By my logic, if that wagon is indeed a 1986, the Dukakis sticker would be period-correct. If it's a 1990, then it's just silly.
But would it be silly for a 1954 LBC to have a badge from Queen Elizabeth's coronation? The badge would have been to signify that you experienced it, not to advertise that it was upcoming. "I was there 2 years ago" -- a bit like a sticker from a trip to the Grand Canyon in 2019. Reasonable?