red57
Jedi Knight

Offline
I've have been following this interesting discussion and have a couple of thoughts.
I agree with OWD724 that the length of the damper rods is not important as long as the piston can achieve full travel. However, I have found slightly different 'dampening resistance' in various dampers so if you have an assortment to choose from, I suggest making sure they both feel the same resistance.
As to AUSMHLY's question "Did all the HD8 have the AUC 2053 pistons?" The Healey HD8s I have had all used the AUC 2053.
However, several years ago I bought a pair of HD8s for $50 at a swap meet that were off of a Rover 2000TC. Seemed like a nice cheap way to upgrade from HD6 to HD8 until I got them home and disassembled them - the old adage 'if it seems too good to be true, it probably is' applied. The pistons in these HD8s are AUC 1278 and entirely different than the pistons we are familiar with in the HD6 and HD8 as found on Healeys.


I marked in red the vacuum ports that carry the intake vacuum to the top side of the piston. The AUC 2053 type have two fairly large holes that go directly into the bottom of the piston where the spring rests but these AUC 1278 have a different shaped entry port on the bottom, a very small drilling thru the side that goes all the way into the area where the spring is, and two fairly small ports in the top flange (also this vacuum is applied between the two 'rings' at the top of the piston).
I have no idea why they are made like this (possibly because they were on a 4 cylinder and the vacuum pulses were larger so the smaller vacuum ports smoothed out the rise of the pistons?? - I do think a pair of HD8s on a 2 liter 4 could be considered over-carbureted...) but it does show that there were definitely more than a couple of HD8 versions made for different applications... and that SU knew more than most of us ever will.
I do believe it is usually best to not mix & match parts from different carbs unless you have damaged parts but definitely the pistons & cambers should stay paired.
Dave
I agree with OWD724 that the length of the damper rods is not important as long as the piston can achieve full travel. However, I have found slightly different 'dampening resistance' in various dampers so if you have an assortment to choose from, I suggest making sure they both feel the same resistance.
As to AUSMHLY's question "Did all the HD8 have the AUC 2053 pistons?" The Healey HD8s I have had all used the AUC 2053.
However, several years ago I bought a pair of HD8s for $50 at a swap meet that were off of a Rover 2000TC. Seemed like a nice cheap way to upgrade from HD6 to HD8 until I got them home and disassembled them - the old adage 'if it seems too good to be true, it probably is' applied. The pistons in these HD8s are AUC 1278 and entirely different than the pistons we are familiar with in the HD6 and HD8 as found on Healeys.


I marked in red the vacuum ports that carry the intake vacuum to the top side of the piston. The AUC 2053 type have two fairly large holes that go directly into the bottom of the piston where the spring rests but these AUC 1278 have a different shaped entry port on the bottom, a very small drilling thru the side that goes all the way into the area where the spring is, and two fairly small ports in the top flange (also this vacuum is applied between the two 'rings' at the top of the piston).
I have no idea why they are made like this (possibly because they were on a 4 cylinder and the vacuum pulses were larger so the smaller vacuum ports smoothed out the rise of the pistons?? - I do think a pair of HD8s on a 2 liter 4 could be considered over-carbureted...) but it does show that there were definitely more than a couple of HD8 versions made for different applications... and that SU knew more than most of us ever will.
I do believe it is usually best to not mix & match parts from different carbs unless you have damaged parts but definitely the pistons & cambers should stay paired.
Dave