• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
  • When posting a classified ad, you MUST select a prefix from the drop-down next to the subject line. If you don't you will get an error and your ad will not be posted!
Tips
Tips

Does stock fuel pump fall behind consumption?

Share this page

T

tdskip

Yoda
Country flag
Offline
Hi guys - was looking at a Mini tech magazine and they had an article on fuel pumps. They suggested that cam driven pumps aren't capable of keeping up on modified/high performance engines.

Any truth to that on our TRs?
 
I've not had any problem with a pump in good condition. That's with triple Z-S, GP2 cam, 1:1.55 RR, & about 9.3 compression.

Fuel filters, on the other hand, are a whole other issue...
 
I would'nt think so. My engine is slightly modified and the carbs were running REAL rich. Black soot on the back of the car, smell of fuel out the tail pipe, The car ran good, but then a friend was behind me and we almost choked him to death going up to Mt. Hamilton. He complained and we adjusted the carbs leaner, ALOT. My point is that I think that the cam driven pumps will pump enough fuel no matter what. Race engines might be another story.
 
Kas Kastner told me that a TR3 race engine needs at least 15 gallons per hour flow.

Kas said it.

I believe it.

That settles it.
 
Twosheds said:
Kas Kastner told me that a TR3 race engine needs at least 15 gallons per hour flow.

Kas said it.

I believe it.

That settles it.
Click to expand...

Wow - that is a lot of fuel.

Will a stock pump do that?
 
tdskip said:
Wow - that is a lot of fuel.

Will a stock pump do that?
Click to expand...

I dunno. It wasn't too hard to measure the flow of my electric pump, but measuring the flow from a stock pump would seem to be a little harder to do. Especially at max RPMs.
 
15 gph doesn't seem like all that much, to me. 15*4 = 60, so that is a quart a minute, or 30 seconds for a pint ... that's about the standard I use for checking the stock pump at idle. I'm pretty sure it will deliver a lot more than that at higher rpm.
 
I'm using 3 Strombergs, all at stock factory settings with no problems. When tuning the carbs, at one point, they were all set very rich and I had no concerns. But I'm using a bit less than 15 gpm.
 
I've never measured flow, although I'm sure Randall is correct and I agree that the stock diaphragm pump is adequate for street conditions. I also agree that it is fair to assume that the pump will be even more efficient at higher rpm - to a point. I don't know what that point is (certainly greater than 5000) but at very high rpms the diaphragm pumps seem to lose efficiency and starvation occurs. Tom
 
TomMull said:
at very high rpms the diaphragm pumps seem to lose efficiency and starvation occurs. Tom
Click to expand...
I agree the point certainly exists (although I don't know what it is either). It's basically similar to valve float, at some point the spring isn't strong enough to overcome the inertia of the lever & diaphragm before the cam comes around again. And unlike the valves, you can't just go to a stronger spring because that also changes the pressure.
 
Back
Top