-
Hi Guest!
You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.
There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
classic car insurance
- Thread starter healeyguy
- Start date
Share this page
tahoe healey
Yoda
Offline
When this came up a few years ago, there was mention that you needed a lockable garage for you collectable car. This was a problem for those with share parking structures in condos and appartments.
I have Hagerty. Nice people. I've had no clames but they here VERY helpful when I tried to get a law changed in California to use year of manufacture plates.
I have Hagerty. Nice people. I've had no clames but they here VERY helpful when I tried to get a law changed in California to use year of manufacture plates.
stevebn2bj7
Jedi Warrior
Offline
Johnny,
That is one of those questions that may need a little interpretation. they are very concerned about the use of classic cars as regular transportation. I would think that the question would be better stated in a way that denotes primary usage for emergencies such as their questions about primary vehicles nad usage. Obviously using the car in an emergency would denote much higher risk to the vehicle and thus they do not want to insure that risk. This is why they and the others need proof of a primary vehicle to write the policy. Now in reality, should there be an emergency and the classic was the only one around, of course you would use it. Hagerty's policy does not limit coverage in this manner so you would have coverage.
Steve
That is one of those questions that may need a little interpretation. they are very concerned about the use of classic cars as regular transportation. I would think that the question would be better stated in a way that denotes primary usage for emergencies such as their questions about primary vehicles nad usage. Obviously using the car in an emergency would denote much higher risk to the vehicle and thus they do not want to insure that risk. This is why they and the others need proof of a primary vehicle to write the policy. Now in reality, should there be an emergency and the classic was the only one around, of course you would use it. Hagerty's policy does not limit coverage in this manner so you would have coverage.
Steve
