• Hi Guest!
    If you appreciate British Car Forum and our 25 years of supporting British car enthusiasts with technical and anicdotal information, collected from our thousands of great members, please support us with a low-cost subscription. You can become a supporting member for less than the dues of most car clubs.

    There are some perks with a member upgrade!
    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
Tips
Tips

Chrysler V-6 amusement

DrEntropy

Great Pumpkin
Platinum
Country flag
Offline
A friend has a 1999 300M with the 3.5 V-6, shows 112K on the clock. He decided to make a social event of repairing the A/C so came over to th' hovel Saturday AM. Found a "pinched" O-ring at the recently replaced expansion valve and put in a new drier... We stretched a one hour job out to two, vacuumed the system down for another. Then went out to find a set of plugs for it (and a CAB run). A/C worked well, plugs were ~original~!! He had replaced the cam belt a few months back but didn't pull the plugs!?! Anyway: the plugs had widened themselves to .075" over the time but the engine STILL ran well! I'm surprised & impressed.
 
Doc,

Are you telling me that if my Dodge Dakota
starts running bad to open the gap on the plugs to
.075,& it will run better?

-Doug
 
Somehow I don't think that'd do much good, Doug. /bcforum/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif

I'm surprised this thing would start at all. Champions, OEM from what I can see. .050" is what I find they should be... even that seems huge.

It's a testament to the ignition system.
 
A friends 1994 Escort (1.9l) calls for something like .054" or something like that. Coil packs do pack a punch it seems.
 
Back
Top