-
Hi Guest!
If you appreciate British Car Forum and our 25 years of supporting British car enthusiasts with technical and anicdotal information, collected from our thousands of great members, please support us with a low-cost subscription. You can become a supporting member for less than the dues of most car clubs.
There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
General TR Best Year for TR6; Preferred over TR250?
- Thread starter KVH
- Start date
Share this page
TR3driver
Great Pumpkin - R.I.P
Offline
Purely opinion, of course, but I'd take a TR3 over a TR6 any day. Pure hairy-chested sports car, none of that sissy stuff like a suspension that actually smooths the bumps or a top that keeps out the rain. And windows that store where they belong, in the top of the garage 
Tom McCahill said it better than I can:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2...NDU5LWJmYmItZWE5MWZkNDE0NzMw/edit?usp=sharing
Tom McCahill said it better than I can:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2...NDU5LWJmYmItZWE5MWZkNDE0NzMw/edit?usp=sharing
Offline
Randall said it well, the difference between the TR4A, TR250 and TR6 is more about the looks than anything else, pick the one you like the looks of the best, not much difference underneath, the 4 cylinder and USA spec 6 make about the same power, the six is a little quieter and smoother, but I personally think the smoothness difference has been greatly exaggerated.
The TR3 (never had one myself, but my brother has had one for 30 years, I have driven it many times and gone with him on long trips in it) is a much more involving ride, more wind, more bumps, more noise. For some it is invigorating and if some vintage sports car experience is good, more is better, and you get more with side curtain TR, for some too much of the aforesaid wind bumps and noise.
The TR3 (never had one myself, but my brother has had one for 30 years, I have driven it many times and gone with him on long trips in it) is a much more involving ride, more wind, more bumps, more noise. For some it is invigorating and if some vintage sports car experience is good, more is better, and you get more with side curtain TR, for some too much of the aforesaid wind bumps and noise.
toysrrus
Yoda
Offline
Hi There KVH,
My $.02.
I`ve owned (4) TR3 & TR3A. I love the low cut doors & simply the profile curves of the fenders, sleek swept back windscreen, great exhaust note with stock exhaust, sidescreen cars are simply "Cool" and nostaglic in looks, performance & "No" creature comforts. Lots of "Sex Appeal"!!!
Having owned (2) TR4 & TR4A; They are a blast to drive, plenty of torque & similar to TR3 performance levels. The "Solid Axle" TR4s ride harsher but handle in the twisty`s better than the "IRS" models. "Squared Off" body style vs. TR3 sensious curves just don`t compare in curb appeal. Real "Roll-Up" windows & Top that folds Up & Down adds some "Creature Comforts" for a more civilized ride especially for the ladies.
I had (2) TR6s (`72 & `73). The 6 cyl. has a smoother, more subdued feel, sound etc vs. TR3 & TR4. It has a "Curb Appeal" of a "Triumph Muscle Car" (In my opinion only). Again, more "Creature Comforts" etc etc than the TR3, 4 or 250. Personally I liked the "`73 best due to "Low Back Seats" vs. the "High Back" protruding seats(Simply a cleaner look). The gauges in the `73 look nicer with the "Chrome Bezels" vs. "Blacked Out" bezels on previous years. A nice feature is the `73 is the last year for the "Chrome Bumper" TR6s.
Thats a whole lot of opinion out of me.
Have Fun.
Russ
My $.02.
I`ve owned (4) TR3 & TR3A. I love the low cut doors & simply the profile curves of the fenders, sleek swept back windscreen, great exhaust note with stock exhaust, sidescreen cars are simply "Cool" and nostaglic in looks, performance & "No" creature comforts. Lots of "Sex Appeal"!!!
Having owned (2) TR4 & TR4A; They are a blast to drive, plenty of torque & similar to TR3 performance levels. The "Solid Axle" TR4s ride harsher but handle in the twisty`s better than the "IRS" models. "Squared Off" body style vs. TR3 sensious curves just don`t compare in curb appeal. Real "Roll-Up" windows & Top that folds Up & Down adds some "Creature Comforts" for a more civilized ride especially for the ladies.
I had (2) TR6s (`72 & `73). The 6 cyl. has a smoother, more subdued feel, sound etc vs. TR3 & TR4. It has a "Curb Appeal" of a "Triumph Muscle Car" (In my opinion only). Again, more "Creature Comforts" etc etc than the TR3, 4 or 250. Personally I liked the "`73 best due to "Low Back Seats" vs. the "High Back" protruding seats(Simply a cleaner look). The gauges in the `73 look nicer with the "Chrome Bezels" vs. "Blacked Out" bezels on previous years. A nice feature is the `73 is the last year for the "Chrome Bumper" TR6s.
Thats a whole lot of opinion out of me.
Have Fun.
Russ
martx-5
Yoda
Offline
I've owned most of them...TR3s, TR4s, TR4As, TR6s...no TR250. My personal favorites are the TR3s and the early TR4s, while they were still a bit raw. No IRS, no wooden dash and a top that got stowed in the boot. I currently own a TR3, but if I added another TR, it would be an early TR4.
I dunno. Much of the comparison is a matter of personal preference. I started with a TR3a in 1962 at the age of 18. Comfort wasn't even a consideration then, but now I as approach 70, it is. Until about 2000, I supported a Tr3 and TR6, but decided to sell the 3 because it wasn't getting much use and was the source of spousal complaints.
In terms of problem areas, the 3 provided much less entertainment than the 6. However, the "problem areas" of the 6 (thrust washers, clutch disengagement, fragile rear hubs, and broken diff mounts) can be remedied).
The 6 motor is smoother and quieter than the 4 cyl., but power is pretty similar.
I like the 6 seats with adjustable rake, but dislike the forward hinge feature that makes access to the area behind the seats a hassle. I think the zippered rear window of the 6 top is a neat idea as it provides lots of fresh air on warm weather trips without being broiled by the sun. Using the hardtop when temps are over 80deg made me appreciate that feature.
Traveling any distance with the 3 means the side curtains either remain in place or the luggage capacity is restricted.
I suppose a straight axle TR4a would provide most of the best of both worlds, but at this age I will stick to the 6. In terms of the comparison of the various years of the 6, I prefer the earlier ones with the blacked out instrument bezels, chrome bumpers, and high back seats. I also prefer the body style of the 6 over the 4 or 250.
Berry
In terms of problem areas, the 3 provided much less entertainment than the 6. However, the "problem areas" of the 6 (thrust washers, clutch disengagement, fragile rear hubs, and broken diff mounts) can be remedied).
The 6 motor is smoother and quieter than the 4 cyl., but power is pretty similar.
I like the 6 seats with adjustable rake, but dislike the forward hinge feature that makes access to the area behind the seats a hassle. I think the zippered rear window of the 6 top is a neat idea as it provides lots of fresh air on warm weather trips without being broiled by the sun. Using the hardtop when temps are over 80deg made me appreciate that feature.
Traveling any distance with the 3 means the side curtains either remain in place or the luggage capacity is restricted.
I suppose a straight axle TR4a would provide most of the best of both worlds, but at this age I will stick to the 6. In terms of the comparison of the various years of the 6, I prefer the earlier ones with the blacked out instrument bezels, chrome bumpers, and high back seats. I also prefer the body style of the 6 over the 4 or 250.
Berry
Last edited:
Geo Hahn
Yoda
Offline
KVH -- Is your friend here in Tucson? If he is I can help set up a trial fitting and possibly test drives in an assortment of TRs. In addition, there are both a TR3A and a TR6 for sale locally that I have had a look at.
One decided advantage of the TR6 may be that a very fine example is possibly easier to find and often for reasonable money. The prices (at least the asking prices) of the early TRs has gotten a bit out of hand of late.
One decided advantage of the TR6 may be that a very fine example is possibly easier to find and often for reasonable money. The prices (at least the asking prices) of the early TRs has gotten a bit out of hand of late.
