Hi All,
Although I prefer the look of the original tank and see the Wizard Aluminum tank as too massive, I believe, as others, its design is what makes it more efficient then our original or re-cored radiators. I have also found the design of the Healey's porous radiator bulkhead, air disturbing opening between the radiator and crossmember, and lack of a fan shroud to also defeat proper cooling on a hot day in traffic. As a result of these Healey design deficits, many of us have resorted to adding bigger radiators, more agressive fans and a plethora of other modifications to help improve engine and rider cooling.
Recently, I have extended a number of panels from radiator to grill in an attempt to diminish radiator recirculation at a stop light. I also have my bilge-blower equipped Cold Air Duct intersect with these panels in an attempt to draw outside air instead of hot recirculating air when waiting for the light (or traffic). Although I have had some moderate success in my efforts, it is far from the benefits gained if the Healey was designed today.
I just returned from an initial test of my implemented of John's fan shroud and found it a definite contributor to reducing running temperature. Other then a lower running temperature (improving the efficiency of my Texas Cooler), John design can be installed and removed through the engine compartment and eliminates the need for removal of any other engine compartment component.
As far as my initial test results, although NJ's ambient temperature has dropped from the mid to high 90s F to 79F this morning, my Healey ran at a constant 170F (160F sleeved thermostat) with a 45-minute idle raising engine temperature to 180-185 F. Will engine temperatures increase when the ambient temperature raises back to the mid 90s, I expect so. How much my running temperature will raise will be my next data point as my pre-implementation running road temperature on a 90s ambient was around 195F @ 45-MPH and around 200F at a traffic light.
Ray(64BJ8P1)