• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
  • When posting a classified ad, you MUST select a prefix from the drop-down next to the subject line. If you don't you will get an error and your ad will not be posted!
Tips
Tips

Altenator conversion

alfa33047

Jedi Hopeful
Country flag
Offline
I am looking for the old post on altenator conversions for a TR-3. The post mentioned a GEO Metro one wire but I want to run the stock TR-3 pully. I hope that someone can help me find the information. Thanks, Bill C., Mesa, Az.
 
Sorry, can't help with the Metro 1-wire. But for my conversion, I just had a machine shop bore out the stock TR3 pulley to fit the shaft.

It was already ruined for a generator anyway, from working loose and wiggling around.
 
I was going to do that on the 4, but decided to switch to a narrow belt ----- after I bought a wide belt conversion kit on eBay. I still have the wide belt alternator pulley if your interested.
 
Ian
Is this the wide belt pulley you were going to use? ebay I have a delco 7127 10 si alternator that I was going to use the side belt on.

Paul
 
Thanks everybody, The GEO Metro/Denso altenator is exactly what we are looking for. Thanks again, Bill C., Mesa,AZ
 
Hi All,

If you don't mind me digging up an old post, I have a couple of more questions. So, I am strongly considering finally upgrading my TR4A's generator to an alternator this year. This is mostly for safety consideration so my headlights, turn signals and horns work at idle.

At the same time, I have to remove and re-fit my (stock) cooling fan as I recently noticed the PO mounted it backwards. (interestingly enough, my cooling system must be well sorted (besides my fan on backwards) as I have never had a single overheating incident in 9 years).

My original plan was to source a wide belt pulley for the new alternator and retain the wide belt. Yet, while "I" have no issues with my wide belt, I have read so many posts about thin belt conversions are the way to go.

Per the Moss thin belt kit instructions (available as pdf on their website), they state you have to remove the water pump to replace the pulley. They also strongly recommend replacing the timing cover gasket and seal since replacing the crank pulley nearly always disturbs these, resulting in leaks.

That begins to look like a lot of work for a thin belt conversion I was on the fence about to begin with. Can anyone tell me if 1) the water pump has to come off and 2) if I will have to replace the timing cover gasket and seal?

Thanks

Bob
PS: If I do go the thin belt route, I would definitely go the BPNW route and retain the stock mechanical fan.
 
I don't think you have to remove the water pump. In fact, I am nearly certain that I did not, when I changed pulleys. I should add, though, that the pulley I replaced had only recently been put in place, so it came off easily. If you need to struggle to get off a pulley that's been on there for years, it might be different.

I don't know about the timing cover seal. If you're that far in there, it probably isn't that much more work to do it...
 
Bill,
Merry Christmas.
I didn't remove the pump or replace seals in the timing cover.
It would make sense to do the timing cover if your car had high miles and you needed to check/replace the tensioning spring/old seals etc but I know your car is low mileage.
I replaced the gen with the alternator and upgraded my headlamp circuit as I run halogens...I do miss the weak yellow glow of the lights nostalgically but it is nice to see ahead.
 
Well, I would certainly have to remove the pump, as my pump is an aftermarket unit with a press-fit pulley (no nut). By not supporting the shaft as you press the new pulley on, you are also taking a chance on dislodging the shaft and causing the pump to leak (some pumps don't have circlips to locate the shaft in the bearings).

Sure sounds like a lot of work for not much gain. The wide belt works fine for you (and me) so why not stick with it?

BTW, NAPA sells a wide, cogged belt that fits and lasts forever. Also more flexible and a LOT easier to change than the stiff, solid things that Moss & TRF (used to) sell. I think I've broken one of them in perhaps 150,000 miles since I started using them; and I changed it on the side of the freeway in about 15 minutes.

When I took the spare belt out to use on the project TR3, the baggie it was wrapped in literally fell apart due to old age
grin.gif
 
RJS said:
...(interestingly enough, my cooling system must be well sorted (besides my fan on backwards) as I have never had a single overheating incident in 9 years)...

Proving, I suppose, that the TR4 fan is about the same no matter which way 'round it is fitted -- with 'about the same' meaning fairly pathetic.

Moseso said:
..If you need to struggle to get off a pulley that's been on there for years, it might be different...

FWIW, a simple in-situ water pump pulley puller can be fashioned from angle iron (assuming you have the original style pulley which can be pulled):

waterpump.JPG


I suppose one small advantage of the thin belt is that it can be changed without extra effort (e.g. loosening the motor mounts and raising the engine a bit). But like Randall, I use the cogged belt from NAPA (#24379) and it seems to be touble-free.
 
Oh, one other thing, Bob; the alternator conversion may not solve your problem. The 60 Amp Ford alternator I used on my TR3A (to support an electric radiator fan, halogen headlights, and a high power stereo) would not keep up at idle either.

And my suggestion, if there isn't room between the rack & fan extension to install a fan belt; is to add shims to the motor mounts until the belt will fit. The earlier cars actually had shims "as original", to line the crank dog up with the crank hole in the radiator; but the same shims can be used to get additional clearance between the extension & the rack.
 
I installed a modern alternator and I still use the thick belt. The stock pulley does fit well to the alternator shaft. For racing purpose I replaced the stock pulley with an aluminum one that I've done myself on a lathe - still for the thick belt.

Hope this helps!

Cheers
Chris
 

Attachments

  • 19540.jpg
    19540.jpg
    23.1 KB · Views: 808
I've a 100 amp alt. and run an elec fan, halogens, lucas driving spots, heater blower, but no stereo. I've shunted the original amp gauge so it's reg about 1/2 of actual load and have never pegged it to 30 (60 actual) with everything on and halogens at bright. Everything remains the same brightness and op at idle too.
 
MadMarx said:
I installed a modern alternator and I still use the thick belt. The stock pulley does fit well to the alternator shaft...

Some of the earlier lower output (35-50 amp) Nippondenso alternators have a 15mm shaft which is the same size as the TR generator shaft.
 
Bob,

I don't recall having any problems running with a generator after restoring my TR4A back in the early 80's. This included a stereo, 50W amplifier and 4 speakers (hey I was only 24 at the time!).

Your headlights, turn signal and horn should work at idle so I would suspect some other problem.

Scott
 
MadMarx said:
I installed a modern alternator
Looks like a great fit, Chris, much better than the big old Ford I used many years ago. Do you happen to know what original application it came from?
 
Hi Everyone,

Thanks for all the input. Given my car is mostly a weekend driver, I have pretty much decided to stay with the original wide belt. Like Randall and Geo I sourced the NAPA cogged wide belt here in town last summer at the local NAPA store. One call in the morning and he had it for me after lunch.

When I replaced that belt, I had <1mm clearance b/t the fan hub and steering rack so I had to loosen the motor mounts and jack under the oil pan to get clearance for the new belt to go on. I'm thinking about shimming the motor mounts with a few differential washers (from a TR4A) but, if I do that I would probably also add a few spacer washers under the radiator to raise it an equal amount. I'm thinking it is probably wise to keep the upper coolant outlet at the same height as the upper radiator inlet. Worst case, I jack the motor every 7 or 8 years when I replace the belt! It takes only about 15 minutes.

So, back to my original issue of low output at idle, I don't recall this issue being as bad several years ago. My battery, while well maintained, is going on 7 years old. It always starts the car no problem but, for $100 I think I will start there. Besides, how many more years can I expect from the battery anyway? If that doesn't work, I'll look into the voltage regulator and stabilizer, and finally consider an alternator upgrade (with wide belt pulley).

Cheers

Bob
 
RJS said:
...My battery, while well maintained, is going on 7 years old. It always starts the car no problem but, for $100 I think I will start there...

$100? Not sure where you buy your batteries but I have been using the ones from Wally-Mart and think them just fine. Costco too has cheap batteries that others have found suitable.
 
Back
Top