• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

3" difference between front and rear track

Nader

Senior Member
Offline
I just fitted wider wheels and tires to my car to fill out the aggressive flares. Looks like the rears still have an inch or so of space under the flares, while the fronts stick out, the right more than the left. When I measured, the front track is a full 3" wider than the rear. Any ideas how this came about? The car was originally set up for autocross, so was this some kind of chassis setup trick?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1636.jpg
    IMG_1636.jpg
    192.5 KB · Views: 132
  • IMG_1637.jpg
    IMG_1637.jpg
    192.6 KB · Views: 125
  • IMG_1638.jpg
    IMG_1638.jpg
    188.3 KB · Views: 129
The stock front track is wider than the rear ... but I do not think it is 3". Maybe the rear end is actually for wire wheel axles?
 
Do the front wheels have any negative camber? -1 degree camber might help the look and the handling.
 
There might already be a little bit of negative camber. I don't know if it has those special bushings installed, but I do know the whole suspension has been gone through, I can see polyurethane bushings everywhere. I am considering modified upper trunnions to get more negative camber. I'm afraid the car might look "stanced" as the kids these days would appreciate.

I wonder if the variation between the front wheels' clearance might just be the way the flares were formed.
 
Did you every try Steve Miller at MG Automotive in Kettering, OH. He helped work on that car and can provide answers.
 
Back
Top