but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
I was thinking about a 120 or 140, but the prices on the coupes have gone up so high, it might be out of my range. Do you think this car could satisfy my XK urge? https://www.hymanltd.com/search/details.asp?stockno=3818&suffix=0&recordcount=32
-
Hi Guest!
You can help ensure that British Car Forum (BCF) continues to provide a great place to engage in the British car hobby! If you find BCF a beneficial community, please consider supporting our efforts with a subscription.
There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Subscribers don't see this gawd-aweful banner
XK150
- Thread starter Pizzi348
- Start date
Share this page
Silverghost
Yoda
Offline
Thats mighty nice....does it qualify for the Cars-for-cash program? 
Roger
Luke Skywalker
Offline
Exotexs said:Roger said:
you mean downhill on a 35 degree grade? I can do that on my bicycle
Ex
No, I mean contemporary Autocar and Motor road tests. Of course, that was for UK spec cars. I don't know if there were any differences for US cars, though back in the late 50s and early 60s I didn't think so.
Beautiful car! Yes these cars do pull very nicely and the figures quoted are achievable (in the right hands) and with a few tweaks can even be improved on, BUT that kind of driving makes short shift of worn drivetrain and suspension parts!
However, Ex does have a valid point, these cars do feel heavy to drive and the suspension is certainly not confidence inspiring around corners!
That said, this car is over fifty years old and, if you enjoy the noise and smell of a car of that vintage, can adapt your driving to the car, the enjoyment is infinite!
This is an improvement on driver safety and comfort compared to the 120/140, due mainly to less rush in development and the lessons learned from the earlier models.
IMHO This particular car is so pretty, I cannot believe anyone (who knows what it takes to drive a classic car) able to afford the privilege of ownership could have the slightest regret!
Not that I don't follow the desire for a 120/140. I have set my sights on owning a 120 roadster and would not compromise that. For a coupe I think you could indulge in a little more luxury!
BUY IT! BUY IT! BUY IT!
However, Ex does have a valid point, these cars do feel heavy to drive and the suspension is certainly not confidence inspiring around corners!
That said, this car is over fifty years old and, if you enjoy the noise and smell of a car of that vintage, can adapt your driving to the car, the enjoyment is infinite!
This is an improvement on driver safety and comfort compared to the 120/140, due mainly to less rush in development and the lessons learned from the earlier models.
IMHO This particular car is so pretty, I cannot believe anyone (who knows what it takes to drive a classic car) able to afford the privilege of ownership could have the slightest regret!
Not that I don't follow the desire for a 120/140. I have set my sights on owning a 120 roadster and would not compromise that. For a coupe I think you could indulge in a little more luxury!
BUY IT! BUY IT! BUY IT!
Jerry_Oliver
Freshman Member
Offline
Matt,
The XK150 FHC is a wonderful car. Practical, sporty, fun to drive, powerful, and posses many mechanical and comfort features not found in the earlier XK models. If you can mange a Model T, you'll get use to the Moss box. I've owned a fair number of different British cars, and currently own 3 Jaguars (E type V12 OTS, and 2 XK150 OTS). And, until recently I owned a XK150 FHC 3.8L two carb O/D car. I'm of the opinion if you own only one Jaguar, the best is the 3.8L XK150 FHC. The 3.8L two carb is nearly as powerful as the 3.4 S model, and with over drive the car sits down at about 90 and cruises along. Yes, the steering is heavy, but only at lower speeds, Just drive fast everywhere. Now, the car in question looks nice, but as in all British cars, the devil is in the details. Rust, the great enemy, can be big dollars in any Jaguar. Also, matching numbers is a big deal in Jaguars as it comes to price. Driving the car, it means nothing. So, if you can find one that is a good car that isn't matching, the price should be about 20% less than one that is matching. I do think the car is about 10-15 grand over priced. I sold my very nice 150 FHC last summer for 40. Keep looking, as its always best to buy from a fellow enthusiasts rather than a dealer.
Jerry in Olympia WA
The XK150 FHC is a wonderful car. Practical, sporty, fun to drive, powerful, and posses many mechanical and comfort features not found in the earlier XK models. If you can mange a Model T, you'll get use to the Moss box. I've owned a fair number of different British cars, and currently own 3 Jaguars (E type V12 OTS, and 2 XK150 OTS). And, until recently I owned a XK150 FHC 3.8L two carb O/D car. I'm of the opinion if you own only one Jaguar, the best is the 3.8L XK150 FHC. The 3.8L two carb is nearly as powerful as the 3.4 S model, and with over drive the car sits down at about 90 and cruises along. Yes, the steering is heavy, but only at lower speeds, Just drive fast everywhere. Now, the car in question looks nice, but as in all British cars, the devil is in the details. Rust, the great enemy, can be big dollars in any Jaguar. Also, matching numbers is a big deal in Jaguars as it comes to price. Driving the car, it means nothing. So, if you can find one that is a good car that isn't matching, the price should be about 20% less than one that is matching. I do think the car is about 10-15 grand over priced. I sold my very nice 150 FHC last summer for 40. Keep looking, as its always best to buy from a fellow enthusiasts rather than a dealer.
Jerry in Olympia WA