oh, Doc, that WinSU proggy I mentioned earlier, has SU needles profiles of sorts... you can view the needle's "relative richness" in table form, and as a graph. It'll also allow you to compare needles on a line graph to see which ones should be richer, leaner, etc.
However, it seems to be a bit skimpy on documentation. For example, the ZH profile shows about 32% relative richness in top end and 0% relative richness at idle. I'm not entirely sure what that means. Does that mean it's 32% richer in top end relative to idle speed? -- scratch that... I've figured relative richness is richness relative to idle. The program uses idle richness as the base line.
on the other hand, When I look at the available needles that start with R (closest match suggestion) I find the needle with the highest "relative richness" is "RC". It shows 60% in top end. However, this needle (I assume it's this needle (RC)) is indicated as being 30% too lean on the "Needles to Try" screen. -- I read more of the program's documentation. It seems it bases fuel consumption on the power output of the engine, and uses the needle's profile to estmate the amount of fuel allowed into the mixture to create power. However, it makes an engine power assumption that I don't think is 100% accurate, and doesn't apply to *all* 1800cc MGB engines. From reading different the books I have, the power out put of the MGB engine varied with each revision. This program only lists 1 MGB engine.... for example, the program has all unmodified MGB engines with 70HP at the wheels, and 88HP at the flywheel...
hmmm... fun fun fun... need to do much more research-n-stuff...