• Hey Guest!
    British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!

    **Upgrade Now**
    (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Tips
Tips

Valve Train Failure

TheSearcherMan

Jedi Trainee
Offline
My lifters and cam are shot after less than 6000 miles. All precautions were taken. I will get to the bottom of this. One or the other I think is soft. The right oil was used. No valve noise was present, 3 lifters were not spinning, however, the worst lifters were. The ones that were not spinning are some of the least damaged ones. I intend to have cam and lifters Rockwell tested, and then, I'll take legal action, if necessary, if either is soft. If neither is soft, I will look at the valve springs, which are supposed to be stock.
 
Well, I will talk about who's later. The cam supplier has backed off his earlier statements. It appears that the lifters are the problem, as some of the damaged lifters do not appear to have damaged the cam, indicating the lifter most likely failed first. As for the rockers, they are stock, along with the valve springs. As for the cam bearings, what does that have to do with lifters and lobe being torn up? Rockwell testing will tell the story.
 
That stinks a whole lot! Sorry to hear about your problem. I hope that you get to the bottom of it and that Graham and I don't have the same cam and lifters.
 
I feel your pain SearcherMan. I had a set of soft lifters start to fall apart with less than 1000 miles. Camshaft was not damaged at all. So far the new, supposedly hardened lifters, have lasted about 3k miles. They were all still spinning when I looked for you the other night. Its still a nagging worry in the back of my mind though.

Just after the new century mark there was a rash of soft lifter as US companies stopped making solid lifters and all the manufacturing was shipped to the pacific rim. It took about three years for US companies to get back into production. The largest market affected was the Hot Rod V8 crowd but our lifters were equally affected. It would have been nice if suppliers would have junked all the soft stuff, absorbed the loss and started over but they didn't.

Good luck with any legal action. I don't think you'll get far and it could end up costing you more than sucking it up. No malice meant by that statement either. Go for it if you really want to. The most you can probably get are new lifters. Which may or may not still be too soft.
 
Thanks for your concern. I have received new lifters from BPNW, they are in a sealed package, AE brand. I have never got anything with AE on it that was not first class. I have also got a new cam, CP, 150 HP, from BPNW, Neumann brand. Swift, who's lifters do you have now? I will most likely cleanup tomorrow, and then start putting it back together. As I said above, some of the lifters that are just starting to fail, there is no damage to cam. In fact, the only visual damage is to the 2 worst lifters. I will call the supplier tomorrow. What really upsets me, I remember the conversation, "I have a few more sets from the original manufacturer, after these are gone, they aren't going to make anymore", and I paid almost twice as much. Who's lifters came apart on you Swift?
 
What were the symptoms? How did you know things were going bad? Now I am getting worried, hate to pull the engine apart the middle of touring season.
 
TheSearcherMan said:
3 Lifters/pushrods not spinning while engine idling.

Interesting... Though, as you said, "3 lifters were not spinning, however, the worst lifters were. The ones that were not spinning are some of the least damaged ones."
 
TheSearcherMan said:
Swift, who's lifters do you have now?


Who's lifters came apart on you Swift?

I have AE's now, the ones that failed were from Moss. Bought in 2000, right in the midst of the 'soft lifter invasion'. I've seen three other failures from lifters in engines built around the same time. A few wiped out the cams as well. One or two lobes on the cam damaged but 8-9 out of 12 lifters showing failure. The lifters related to the failed lobes were the worst.

Moss knew about all the failures, they appreciated the feedback and offered replacements but I sourced parts from elsewhere. Probably why Moss is now offering the new hardened lifter set. Soft lifters were an industry wide problem for a while. Its taken some time to re-adjust and replace those already in the supply line.

As much as you'd like to blame the suppliers, it's really not their fault. They ask for items made to correct specifications, strive for the lowest price, and don't know the stuff is sub-standard until it starts to fail and we as consumers tell them about it. If they attempt more stringent quality control the prices can go way up and then the consumers complain about prices. For every one person who tells them that they would be happy to pay higher prices for quality parts, there are ten that complain about high prices. It sucks at times but is the game we have to play. In the small world of LBC parts it's sort of a co-operative between consumers and suppliers.

The big cam companies that were still attaching their names and reputations to the sub-standard parts are the ones that were hurt the most and brought some of the manufacturing back here and raised the quality control. The companies like Erson, Crane, Lunati, etc... with huge distributors like PAW, Summit and Jegs make our LBC community look frightfully small.
 
Moseso said:
TheSearcherMan said:
3 Lifters/pushrods not spinning while engine idling.

Interesting...
Not surprising, really. Having the lifters turn just optimizes their life, kind of like rotating your tires. Even with the lifter not turning, it should last 50,000 miles or more. But turning is no panacea against early failure due to other factors (like soft lifters).

I'm curious though, did "all precautions" included running the engine at fast idle (no revving) as soon as it fired, for about 15 minutes ?

Also, I assume you used plenty of assembly lube on the lobes & lifters, but was it a moly-based lube ?
 
Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes. Now, get a load of this, I put both the cam I just received next to the one I just removed. Boy, what at shocker, the lobes are in such different locations. I put the new cam in the engine. The lobes are all over the place. Example, one lobe mite be centered on the lifter bore, some others toward the front of the engine in regards to the lifter bore, however, some lobes, the edge of the lobe is centered in regards to the lifter bore. This cannot be correct, so, it goes back to the supplier. Now, I called the motherland, there is a cam blank problem. I was going to order one of theirs, they said they were out. One has to wonder are they out, or, do they know I will check the lobe location and they don't want to sell to me? They did say I would be better off with a regrind, as long as I used an original factory profile. Richard indicated a week or so ago, he was aware of the lobe location problem, now he has backed off of that statement. We can talk about motor oil all we want to, but, its a combination of errors, lobe location, soft lifters, higher lift, spring tension. Once again, I think Rockwell testing will tell the story on the lifers, and camshaft. If there is no accoutability, what incentive do suppliers have to sell acceptable parts?
 
swift6 said:
As much as you'd like to blame the suppliers, it's really not their fault. They ask for items made to correct specifications, strive for the lowest price, and don't know the stuff is sub-standard until it starts to fail and we as consumers tell them about it.
True enough; but then why does it take YEARS between when people start to complain, and the vendor actually does something ?

Answer : Because they buy the stuff in bulk, and unless the return rate reaches 50% or so, it's cheaper to sell the defective goods and take the returns. And given the way most LBC folk operate, the return rates almost never get that high. Lots of people won't bother to try to return a defective part (especially in a case like this, where it's not clear which part was defective). Plus I've got parts I bought 20 years ago and haven't installed yet !

Not picking on any particular vendor, just stating the situation as I see it. We went through the same thing with synchro rings a few years back; someone had a huge lot of them made that didn't work very well. But since no one could apparently identify the exact problem, and most of the rings worked well enough, the defective rings continued to be sold until the lot (I heard it was 100,000 rings) was gone.

At least with lifters, we know what to look for.
 
As I understand it, the lobes are supposed to be off-center to the bores, to encourage the lifter to turn; and not all in the same direction (to reduce force along the camshaft axis). But I can't say I've checked that.
 
I used the lifters from BPNW part number CF339BT with the oil drain holes, I've only got 300 miles on them yet so not sure how they will stand up. Tthis is what BPNW say about them.

"These are Heavy Duty Tappets for a TR250-6, Spitfire 67-80, 1500 Midget. They are tuftrided for long life and heavy duty use. Every batch of tappets are tested when they arrive from the UK. Each tappet will have a minimum hardness of Rockwell 58. The industry standard is 50 for tappets. We have never had a bad batch of tappets like other companies and never will because of our dedication to dealing with only quality suppliers."
 
Those are the ones I'm using in my rebuild -- except, of course, they're the ones for TR3/4. I sure hope they're as good as BPNW says. It'll probably be another 1 - 2 months before I can fire it up...
 
this is why I am very reluctant to rebuild the engine in My TR6 so as long as it doesnt burn oil or smoke like my grand father, I think I will leave well enough alone

Hondo
 
hondo402000 said:
this is why I am very reluctant to rebuild the engine in My TR6 so as long as it doesnt burn oil or smoke like my grand father, I think I will leave well enough alone

Hondo

<span style="color: #990000">I am with you Hondo.
I will be ever so happy if my stock engine quits
breaking down all the time. </span>
 
Well, I got burned on the sychro ring deal also, had to do the trans all over again. However, I don't see how the lobes being where they are now will work for long term. I mean, 2 lobes, the edge of the lobe is in the center of the lifter bore. Another one, the lobe is centered. This can't be right. And, the suppliers, at least some of them, they know about the lobe problem. The problem I have now is where to get a cam. I'd like to have the measurements on a stanpart cam.
 
Back
Top