Offline
Re: 110,130,125,125
Yes, that one cylinder is low, although not hideously so. If the same relative results are achieved with the above method, you might try one more time on that cylinder after dribbling a bit of motor oil in through the spark plug hole. If the number increases, chances are rings (and/or bores ???) are worn in that cylinder. If they don't change, there might be a problem elsewhere, such as valves?
Jim, before you do a tear-down, you might want to run this test again with the engine WARMED UP, rather than cold. Also, if you didn't, it's often best to do this with all plugs out and throttle held wide open. I wouldn't exepct the results to change all that much, but one never knows....Jim Lee said:On the advice of the Forum I did a cold compression test to see if I needed new rings. Cylinders 1 to 4 tested as
100 - 1
130 - 2
125 - 3
125 - 4
Yes, that one cylinder is low, although not hideously so. If the same relative results are achieved with the above method, you might try one more time on that cylinder after dribbling a bit of motor oil in through the spark plug hole. If the number increases, chances are rings (and/or bores ???) are worn in that cylinder. If they don't change, there might be a problem elsewhere, such as valves?
Hey Guest!
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
But note that the oil will always make a small increase in reading by displacing some of the combustion chamber volume. A large increase indicates problems with the rings. How much depends on how much oil you use too, so use about the same amount in each cylinder. If you have a pump-type oil can, two pumps is about right.