Hi Guest!
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
Offline
Here I go with some more questions.... I appreciate the indulgence of my seemingly endless curiosity about what I should do with my LBC 
In the attached pictures you can see a composition gasket and a copper gasket placed on top of the head that I positioned on my work bench and a picture of the valves inside the cylinder head. The head was previously "grounded" on these sides to improve gas flow, I will assume, and the head was milled for higher compression (you may recall my earlier posts), if you look where I have numbered the cylinders and drawn some arrows on the blue tape covering the valves this is where the lip of the gasket is slightly "proud" i.e. wider than the bore of the valve cylinder chamber by maybe .02 to .01. and there is a bit of a sharp edge on the opposite side of the arrows in each chamber.
Since I am not an expert on engines I'm wondering if the "hanging edge" of the gasket will this cause a problem or at least be somewhat obtrusive to air flow inside the combustion chambers and maybe cause premature failure? The composition gasket looks to be pretty nice with the silicon seals, the rims of steel appear to fit snug on top of each of the cylinders, over all it seems like a pretty nice fit. The copper gasket is .032 thick and the cylinder holes are not exactly perfectly round and there is no "crush factor" when the copper gasket is installed.
My questions: The roundness of the steel gaskets (composition gasket) sitting on top of the cylinders are definatly not the same roundness of the valve chambers. Would the lip of the gasket that is “hanging” be prone to fail or be disruptive to the operation of the valves? There's not a lot present but there is enough to be detectable plus I am thinking I might file the valve chamber more to eliminate all sharp edges something that Roger Williams wrote about in his book "Enthusiast's Restoration Manual (pg 94) but I would not grind back more than the size of the gasket my only issue is where it was done by the PO. However, if I use a solid copper gasket I can file the gasket a little to fit the size of the valve chamber better and seemingly a better combustion chamber that is void of any obtrusions from the gasket while maintaining a good seal from the copper on top of the cylinder sleeves. There's a fair amount of questions about the reliability of a solid copper gasket that is used by some racers but Charley seems to have had some good experience. The composition gasket has had some good reviews by others so for me it is going to come down to deciding which gasket installation would provide the best performance (street application) and reliability. Any Thoughts?
In the attached pictures you can see a composition gasket and a copper gasket placed on top of the head that I positioned on my work bench and a picture of the valves inside the cylinder head. The head was previously "grounded" on these sides to improve gas flow, I will assume, and the head was milled for higher compression (you may recall my earlier posts), if you look where I have numbered the cylinders and drawn some arrows on the blue tape covering the valves this is where the lip of the gasket is slightly "proud" i.e. wider than the bore of the valve cylinder chamber by maybe .02 to .01. and there is a bit of a sharp edge on the opposite side of the arrows in each chamber.
Since I am not an expert on engines I'm wondering if the "hanging edge" of the gasket will this cause a problem or at least be somewhat obtrusive to air flow inside the combustion chambers and maybe cause premature failure? The composition gasket looks to be pretty nice with the silicon seals, the rims of steel appear to fit snug on top of each of the cylinders, over all it seems like a pretty nice fit. The copper gasket is .032 thick and the cylinder holes are not exactly perfectly round and there is no "crush factor" when the copper gasket is installed.
My questions: The roundness of the steel gaskets (composition gasket) sitting on top of the cylinders are definatly not the same roundness of the valve chambers. Would the lip of the gasket that is “hanging” be prone to fail or be disruptive to the operation of the valves? There's not a lot present but there is enough to be detectable plus I am thinking I might file the valve chamber more to eliminate all sharp edges something that Roger Williams wrote about in his book "Enthusiast's Restoration Manual (pg 94) but I would not grind back more than the size of the gasket my only issue is where it was done by the PO. However, if I use a solid copper gasket I can file the gasket a little to fit the size of the valve chamber better and seemingly a better combustion chamber that is void of any obtrusions from the gasket while maintaining a good seal from the copper on top of the cylinder sleeves. There's a fair amount of questions about the reliability of a solid copper gasket that is used by some racers but Charley seems to have had some good experience. The composition gasket has had some good reviews by others so for me it is going to come down to deciding which gasket installation would provide the best performance (street application) and reliability. Any Thoughts?
