Recently replaced the Dunlop (OE) tires on my Tacoma (I put a <span style="text-decoration: underline">lot</span> on miles on it) with Yokohamas. NOT happy with them, had the two front tires bubble on the sidewalls after 20K miles. Replaced all four with new tried-and-true Michelins, very satisfied. The Yokohamas on the wife's Accord are showing extreme wear, need to replace after 25K miles. Yokohama tires have been a great disappointment to me. Even the Hancook tires on my son's old S10 (cheap tires) have worn like iron, comparing to Yokohamas. Hard to argue with Michelin tires.
A little aside, around here there are three Carbon Black plants that manufacture most of the carbon black for tires, inks, etc. for the US economy. A very big business and employer for out area. Many friends have worked in the labs at all three plants, and to a man (or woman) they all agree that Michelin is by far the most picky and demanding of the quality of carbon black they buy. (Carbon black the the black soot that makes tires black and bonds the rubber together, in a nutshell)
A little aside, around here there are three Carbon Black plants that manufacture most of the carbon black for tires, inks, etc. for the US economy. A very big business and employer for out area. Many friends have worked in the labs at all three plants, and to a man (or woman) they all agree that Michelin is by far the most picky and demanding of the quality of carbon black they buy. (Carbon black the the black soot that makes tires black and bonds the rubber together, in a nutshell)