Thank you all for the advice.
FWIW, large cities and crowds don't bother me much. I'm used to Chicago, and it's probably why I'm considering moving. My sister lived in Hollywood (literally-her building was just a couple blocks off of Hollywood Blvd., near the Chinese Theater), so I've experienced the touristy crowd areas a bit. At it's worst it didn't seem any worse than Michigan Avenue on a Saturday, which is wall to wall Japanese tourists and middle aged people from Schaumburg anyway.
I'm familiar with the layout of the Greater Los Angeles Area and the various communites around there. A couple of people tell me that I should look into living in Burbank (my Mom loves Burbank. "It's just like Naperville!" she says), but something tells me I couldn't afford to rent a doghouse in Burbank, much less an apartment. I'm not interested in living especially close to the beaches, at least not walking distance close. I don't ski (I do sled). Near the canyons would be cool, though.
I'm not celebrity obsessed (hardly anyone I've met there, even people who work in the industry, seemed that way), so that's not much of an attraction. Most of the anti-Los Angeles stuff people say (smog, etc.) were effectively debunked by Sister anyway. Nothing I couldn't deal with.
More than anything, I need a change of scenery, and I know that the scenery in the area appeals to me. Also, there are several industries in the area (including the film and television industries) that would probably offer employment opportunities that are closed to me here in Chicago (I am not talking about being on telly or something, but the fact that they have all sorts of jobs just like the ones I'm trying to get here).
In any event, I'm 99% sure I'm moving, whether it be to the West Coast or The Nashville Option (which would be more of a vacation than anything else).