Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey Guest! British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!
**Upgrade Now** (PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
Not that it has much to do with Randy's amazing car, but the TR2/3 is narrow. Mine is too narrow for my scissor lift. If my google search is correct, it is also 4 inches narrower (track measure) than the MGA and 5 inches narrower overall than the A40 Austin. Not surprisingly it's a good 2 feet narrower than a Lincoln Continental of the same vintage.
Tom
If you hang around Randy's car for a little bit, it just looks right and original TR3s look anorexic.
He pretty much had to winden it as he wanted to use a TR6 frame with IRS and the front IRS mounting points would have been out in the air with a stock TR3 body. Cutting it down the middle and widening it took a lot of skill and if it had been me I'd probably have just used the original chassis amd grafted the new running gear in, but then I have never been a fan of the Triumph IRS rear suspension - very poorly selected spring rates and half shafts that are diabolical if you race one (most replace them with better shafts_.
Randy did a very professional conversion and still retained the basic lines and style of the TR3. If you want to see how the a humble TR3 gets butchered go to this site: "Red , White and Boosted. They try to put a TR3 shell on a Mercedes chassis! Oh my eyes!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.