[ QUOTE ]
Keoke, I've heard that sort of argument before. Until I see technical proof (I mean an o-scope trace showing what the peak voltage is) I don't believe it.
The polarity of the spark is "wrong"? The coil works when the low tension field collapses. This collapsing magnetic field produces voltage in the secondary winding. The magnitude of the voltage in the secondary winding is proportional to the voltage in the primaries by the winding ratio of each. Exactly how does a collapsing magnetic field increase by 20% the energy in the secondaries without changing the number of secondary windings?
[/ QUOTE ]
Hi Doug,
I'm sure that you know the common theory:
Electrons flow from negative to positive electrodes.
Electrons are emitted more freely by a hotter electrode, ie. the old vacuum tubes with a cathode heater.
The spark plug center electrode is hotter than the ground electrode.
So:
A hotter center electrode that is negative with respect to the ground electrode should require a lower voltage to ionize the spark gap & vs.
How much lower the required voltage, is subject to how much hotter the center electrode is than the ground electrode & possibly other variables. Possibly 20% under the right conditions. I have never seen a scope trace or other measurements that would quantize this "lowered voltage requirement". I think any benefit would only happen if the ignition was marginal to start with.
In any event, the coil primary & the secondary will only build the voltage level that is necessary to ionize the spark gap. Once this ionizing level is reached, the voltage required to maintain the spark is considerably lower.
In the real world, I have found no practical difference in engine performance with either spark polarity. Maybe Just not in the right place at the right time?
Later,
D