I agree with Jack - great thread.
Now, I'm by no means a Spridgeter, but I think I see some misunderstanding. Not that there's a heck of a lot of real understanding anyway; no less an authority than Alan Staniforth wrote that anti-roll bars were something of a black art.
The bar must be free to rotate in its bushings. I think that's what the early poster meant by slipping around, not moving laterally. And I don't think from a functional viewpoint it matters whether the locators are both on the outside or both on the inside, or even on both sides of one bush, just as long as they restrain the bar from sideways movement.
As for what they do, they modify the roll stiffness at the end they're fitted. If the chassis is reasonably stiff in torsion, this will affect the other end, and with a unibody like the Spridget that works.
They don't change total weight transfer - they can't if you think about it. Imagine 2 otherwise identical cars in a corner, at the same speed. One has very stiff springs, the other very soft. One rolls more than the other, and transfers weight to the outside wheels via the springs. The other transfers the same amount of weight but via the suspension components - wishbones or what have you. (If the suspension is a cart spring, then in one case is by vertical load, in the other by lateral load). To express it crudely, in one case there's more push down on the wheel, in the other there's more push sideways.