[ QUOTE ]
I gather that there has been a rash of bad TO bearings.
[/ QUOTE ]
While there are probably some poor quality TO bearigns around, I'm under the impression that most are just fine. It's most likely improper installation has led to most failures.
However, it sounds like you are doing it right.
A related issue has been much higher than original pressure plate spring rates is found in all the available replacements (I seem to recall they are actually a Volvo part?). That's bound to put a heavier demand on any TO bearing. There has been a lot of discussion of this in the past and there are some websites with well-done comparisons and thorough explanations (sorry, I don't have a URL).
Another thought is that the TR6 (5/250?) did away with the locating pins/dowels on the engine to gearbox flange joint. Some folks feel this allows some potential for misalignment that can lead to problems. There are dowel kits available, or some folks just use the right size drill bit temporarily.
And, the earlier cars had a stud, instead of a bolt, at the 12 o'clock position on the rear of the engine. This makes installation/alignment a bit easier and helps reduce risk of damaging the input shaft by accidentally letting the gearbox's weight hang on it. Simple fix... just permanently install a stud there (5/16 NC on one end, 5/16 NF on the other).
Combine the above issues with the minimal margin for error of the later, non-adjustable slave cylinders and there are a lot of clues why simple clutch jobs turn into problems and need to be redone. A possible solution might be to just install the adjustable type slave cylinder, learn how to adjust it and do so from time to time.
The Gunst kit may be a good solution, too. A bit more expensive initially, but many users say it's solved problems. (As already noted, it comes with the bronze carrier.)
I'm toying with the idea of installing a hydraulic annular release, Tilton or similar, on my TR4 (which actually uses a TR4A-6 flywheel and clutch setup just like yours).
Cheers!
Alan