Hey - did you know if you click on the title of a thread it will take you to the first unread post since you last visited that thread?
but were afraid to ask: 
STOP!! Never post your email address in open forums. Bots can "harvest" your email! If you must share your email use a Private Message or use the 
smilie in place of the real @
Pretty Please - add it to our Events forum(s) and add to the calendar! >> 
OP
Online
-
Hey Guest!
British Car Forum has been supporting enthusiasts for over 25 years by providing a great place to share our love for British cars. You can support our efforts by upgrading your membership for less than the dues of most car clubs. There are some perks with a member upgrade!**Upgrade Now**
(PS: Upgraded members don't see this banner, nor will you see the Google ads that appear on the site.)
TR6 Starter not engaging into ring gear
- Thread starter Gliderman8
- Start date
Share this page
OP
Online
Maybe I can clear this up. First let me say "good eyes".
The Original ring gear had the bevel facing AWAY from the starter pinion. Don't ask me why it was put on that way. I can only surmise that the flywheel may have been used in other Triumph cars where the starter came from the other direction.
When the NEW one was put on yesterday, I faced the bevel towards the "business end" of the starter.
The Original ring gear had the bevel facing AWAY from the starter pinion. Don't ask me why it was put on that way. I can only surmise that the flywheel may have been used in other Triumph cars where the starter came from the other direction.
When the NEW one was put on yesterday, I faced the bevel towards the "business end" of the starter.
poolboy
Yoda
Offline
Rear facing bevel may have been a hold over from the 250's and some early 69 Inertia Starter days... I'm not sure the bevel was even important when the switch to the pre-engaged starter was adapted. I haven;t looked at a stock pre-engaged TR6 starter in a few years but I seem to remember the teeth of it's pinion were beveled.
OP
Online
Yes, it was heated and shrunk onto the flywheel. No other attachment was made. The new ring gear was 0.01" smaller than the original so I decided to just heat it and drop it on.
OP
Online
Flywheel and clutch installed today. Waiting for help with the transmission.
TexasKnucklehead
Jedi Knight
Offline
Herman talked me into replacing my McLeod pressure plate when the disc came apart due to changes during the manufacturing process. -Less than 20,000 miles when a spring worked it's way out. I'd like to suggest you closely examine your plate before putting it all back together. Attached is a picture of my failed disc.
Attachments
OP
Online
Thanks for the heads up. There's about 4,000 miles on it. I
will have a look at it tomorrow.
What did you replace yours with?
will have a look at it tomorrow.
What did you replace yours with?
TexasKnucklehead
Jedi Knight
Offline
Actually, I don't know. I had to get the proper bushing from Herman, so I also got whatever he suggested and had to ship me ASAP. As you can see from this picture, the retainers for the springs are much beefier than the failed one. Also be sure to lube the shaft where the disc spline rides on the shaft spline very well, but not so much that it slings grease out. -It's important that the disc is able to move a little on the spline when the clutch is operated. And equally important that the disc is never contaminated by grease.
Attachments
OP
Online
Spent Saturday and Sunday putting the transmission, interior and everything else back together. It starts great now!
It's On The Road Again....
It's On The Road Again....