It's probably a bit late to compare the old and new springs side-by-side, but I do wonder if the new spring might be a bit "overarched"? The original spring specs were 7 leaves, each leaf being .2188" thick (5.56mm); laden camber of 1.88" NEGATIVE, +/- .13" (38.9mm +/-3.3mm); load 945 lb.; rate 155 lb/in. -- if that data is of any use to you. :wink:
As I suggested earlier, the factory workshop manual states to "Place a trolley jack under the differential casing, remove the chassis stands and, with the vertical links supported at their running height, load the car and lower its rear end until the axle shafts assume their static laden operating position. This is to allow the rubber bushings to assume their correct working position before tightening the nuts [which, going by the accompanying diagram in the manual are the upper and lower shock nuts and the spring eye bolt/nut]. I would add to that the two radius arm nuts and bolts, since you've replaced that item.
I've had all too many opportunities, for various reasons, to R&R axles on my Herald in the last nine years. I've been doing the above, and I always seem to get a good slight negative camber in "static laden" position (book says 1.54" for the sedan; mine might even be a bit more). Oh, and it probably can't hurt to lubricate the spring as per normal maintenance recommendations. Seems to help on the Herald!
Oh, it just occurred to me: have you had the rear suspension realigned, now that you have those nice adjustable radius arms? That probably couldn't hurt!