Hi All,
As I see it, the choice of what brake fluid to use is not one of which is better but which has the set of benefits that serve my functional requirements best. In Derek's situation, the Hydroscopic nature of a glycol based fluid is not a major issue when fully replacing (bleeding) fluid on a yearly basis. Randy also makes the point that changes his practiced and well understood operational procedures, related to the use of Silicone, has a potential risks that is not overcome by the benefits he would realize. Also, Doug brings up that some manufacturers will not warrant their parts when Silicone brake fluid is used, whatever the basis of the manufacturer's reasoning.
Although I can appreciate and respect the decisions of those not making the transition to Silicone brake fluid, I long ago did make that decision, not only for the protection of my paint, but for the fact the its benefits are a best match for the profile of use, operation, and maintenance of my Healey and Triumph. For me, the article had centralized and supported many of the perspectives I had developed from sources long ago misplaced as well as providing a base of understanding to address such potential issues as expelling air from the system. Looking back, I don't remember dealing with or even submitting a hydraulic part or component for warranty and don't remember seeing a warning relating to the use of Silicone brake fluid.exchange so never needed to review the manufacturer's position. I would be keen on understanding the basis or reasoning behind a component manufacturer like TRW, who sells large quantities of components to the military, restricting their sales to the Federal Government.
Have I been lucky? Are my experiences unique? I don't think so. However, switching is a choice and not an obligation.
Happy Father's Day,
Ray(64BJ8P1)