[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that finds the stock type stuff to be adequate?
[/ QUOTE ]Not at all! Ironically, many folks never end up comparing apples to apples; rather, they'll ditch worn-out, 40-year-old OEM shocks in favor of brand-new Konis or the like. Sure it's bound to be a drastic improvment, but sometimes so is simply topping off the rear lever shocks with fluid and putting new OEM (or equivalent) shocks on the front.
Meanwhile, I'm also a Koni fan, having had them on Spitfires, GT6s and Volvo 140 series cars. In all cases, I did "compare apples to apples" and was very pleased at the improvement in each application.
Unfortunately, having Konis rebuilt nowadays generally costs a good deal MORE than you might pay on sale for brand-new ones. If Koni no longer makes the shock (or if the current shock they supply isn't quite like the original, as seems to be the case with Spitfire front shocks), then it might be worthwhile to have old Konis rebuilt. I'm still debating which way to go on a pair of Koni front shocks for a Herald/Spitfire. On the other hand, the reason I can't use one of them is that it appears to be bound up/rusted from years of bad storage (or possibly an internal problem). Every other Koni I ever had I was never able to come close to "wearing out"!