
Offline
I keep reading the posts on the subject of PCVs, and the problems and issues. I’m just not understanding the issue or the intended technology. Let me begin by mentioning 3 TR4A setups I have. These are not my setups—they are as acquired. My interest stems from crazy oil consumption I had on two of the cars, as further explained below:
1) Vehicle 1: No draft tube; PCV; non-vented oil cap—this setup, in my opinion, caused excessive oil consumption. I seem to have at least partially resolved the problem by replacing a cracked diaphragm in the PCV valve. But I’ll have to closely watch this, as I am skeptical based on prior posts on this Forum that much oil consumption could come solely from a cracked PCV diaphragm.
2) Vehicle 2: No draft tube; PCV; vented oil cap. This vehicle runs perfect. Oil consumption seems slightly excessive, though I need to watch it more thoroughly.
3) Vehicle 3: Draft tube; PCV; vented oil cap—looks like the cap came with the HRG valve cover. This vehicle runs fine, and I guess the vented cap makes sense, but having both a PCV valve and draft tube seems superfluous. Any harm leaving it that way?
I’d sure welcome any thoughts or observations.
1) Vehicle 1: No draft tube; PCV; non-vented oil cap—this setup, in my opinion, caused excessive oil consumption. I seem to have at least partially resolved the problem by replacing a cracked diaphragm in the PCV valve. But I’ll have to closely watch this, as I am skeptical based on prior posts on this Forum that much oil consumption could come solely from a cracked PCV diaphragm.
2) Vehicle 2: No draft tube; PCV; vented oil cap. This vehicle runs perfect. Oil consumption seems slightly excessive, though I need to watch it more thoroughly.
3) Vehicle 3: Draft tube; PCV; vented oil cap—looks like the cap came with the HRG valve cover. This vehicle runs fine, and I guess the vented cap makes sense, but having both a PCV valve and draft tube seems superfluous. Any harm leaving it that way?
I’d sure welcome any thoughts or observations.
Last edited: