Tim Hollister said:
How do you know? Did you bid on that one?
Tony Barnhill said:
Well, I read Vizard...& read Vizard...& read Vizard
& then I decided to build my engine back stock!
Everytime I read that book I wish I'd gotten an engineering degree!
After getting a mechanical engineering degree, one realises that his work is just standard practice and deductions, written in an entertaining manner. He is as such an excellent design engineer, but he excells in the quantity of testing, record keeping, in his entertaining writing ability (together with his wife), in deduction of problems, and he isn't afraid to make a new part to try to resove the problems.
Stock engines are designed as a compromise between economy of assembly and good performance. The image of the company determines where the compromise falls. Interesting that two opposite ends of this spectrum both start with F. Ferrari builds with little concern for economy of efficiency. Thus their cars perform very well, and are very expensive. Ford builds with little concern for performance or fine craftsmanship, but they are produced in enormous quantities optimised for speed of assembly.
A low cost engine like the A-series can be a much better performer if some basic quality steps are taken in the design and assembly. Mostly manifolds, ports, balancing, light weight components, cam timing, optimising springs and masses (resonant frequencies) like for example valves and valve springs, load distributions, material choices with regard to average, maximum and cyclic stress, etc.
Many times, along with better performance, you can get better fuel economy. It's all just a challenge, Have fun /bcforum/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif