lawguy said:
.... The clay is and abrasive. Granted, it is about the finest, least harsh, safest abrasive you can use on a finish, but it is an abrasive. The fact that it is used with lubrication does not change that. Wet sanding is done with lubication as well...
But that’s not how clay works. Clay isn’t abrasive in the same sense that sandpaper is abrasive.
Sandpaper’s abrasive particulates are bonded to the surface of the sheet and project outward, toward the finish. The act of sanding forces the exposed particles into the finish, where they exert forces higher than the molecular bonding strength of the bulk finish material. The lubricant makes for cleaner cuts and carries away the swarf.
The abrasive particles in clay are held
inside the clay. They don’t project out. The clay fills in the voids between the particles, presenting a smooth surface to the finish. The smooth surface of the clay rides on the lubricant film over the smooth surface of the finish (and possibly, I would argue, over the smooth surface of the wax layer).
When the clay comes to a contaminant that projects above the finish the contaminant is forced into the clay (the exact opposite of sanding) and by forcing itself into the clay presents itself to the abrasives held within. The contaminant is abraded until it is flush to the finish.
It’s easy to demonstrate how non-abrasive clay is to a finish. If you have a finish with the very slightest of swirls try claying them out. They won’t go anywhere. The swirls in most peoples’ paint come from the rags and whatever they use for washing and waxing. People who wash and wax their cars regularly for years will usually have paint that’s intact but full of swirls and scratches. If the clay can’t even remove the finest of those swirls that are caused by continual washing and waxing, how can it be abrasive enough to damage the finish, even over the very long term?
While it’s easy to demonstrate how gentle claying is to the finish it’s much more difficult to get a handle on how it affects wax. There simply aren’t any reliable, objective techniques that we can use in our own garages to assess the condition of a wax film. (I haven’t heard of any laboratory techniques that give direct quantitative measures of wax film integrity either.)
The above is a macroscopic view of the clay process. I’m sure there are secondary subtleties. There may well be some sort of boundary layer/surface tension/God knows what affect that does cause degradation of the wax film. But until I see it demonstrated of explained I’ll still consider it an unknown.
The “squeak test” you mention does give some subjective indication and anyone can perform it at home. Unfortunately, it’s only and indirect indicator and it’s highly unreliable. I’ve applied multiple waxes side by side on a pristine, freshly compounded panel and not only did they each squeak differently, but some would pass or fail with only the slightest changes in technique.
So where does that all leave me?
Well, since claying doesn’t harm a finish in any way I do it often. I do a lot of “spot claying” on very small areas when I see obvious contaminants. Since I still don’t know how claying affects wax I err on the safe side and generally wax after claying.
Some time ago, I got to the point where I clay every time I wax. Now I’m starting to crossover to where I’m waxing more because I’m claying more.
PC.